1993
DOI: 10.1089/scd.1.1993.2.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Isolation and Expansion of Human CD34+Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Abstract: The isolation and expansion of CD34+ cells has numerous applications as supportive therapy for cytopenias that occur postchemotherapy. In this report, we describe a simple system to directly isolate and culture human CD34+ cells. Using this system, CD34+ cells isolated from bone marrow were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF, G-CSF, erythropoietin, stem cell factor, IL-1, IL-3, and IL-6. Cell expansions up to 100-fold were noted during the first 2 weeks of culture with high maintenance of CD34+ cells during th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive selection of CD34 expressing cells has been applied to reduce tumour cell contamination in both bone marrow and peripheral blood autografts [16, 17]. Several methods for CD34 selection are available, such as: immunomagnetic beads directly coated with the anti‐CD34 MoAb BI‐3C5 (class I: Dynal, Oslo, Norway) [9]; beads coated with anti‐mouse antibodies that recognize 9C5 (class II) bound cells (Isolex: Baxter, Irvine, CA, USA) [18]; Sepharose particles with 12.8 (class I) for column immunoabsorption (Cellpro Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) [19]; magnetic microspheres with QBEND‐10 (class II, MACS: Miltenyi Biotec Gmbh, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) [20]; and panning on culture flasks using ICH3 (class II: Applied Immune Systems, Menlo Park, CA, USA) [21]. According to the literature CD34 selection is hampered by low yields, 35–70% for the laboratory scale methods and 45–50% for the grafting materials [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive selection of CD34 expressing cells has been applied to reduce tumour cell contamination in both bone marrow and peripheral blood autografts [16, 17]. Several methods for CD34 selection are available, such as: immunomagnetic beads directly coated with the anti‐CD34 MoAb BI‐3C5 (class I: Dynal, Oslo, Norway) [9]; beads coated with anti‐mouse antibodies that recognize 9C5 (class II) bound cells (Isolex: Baxter, Irvine, CA, USA) [18]; Sepharose particles with 12.8 (class I) for column immunoabsorption (Cellpro Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) [19]; magnetic microspheres with QBEND‐10 (class II, MACS: Miltenyi Biotec Gmbh, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) [20]; and panning on culture flasks using ICH3 (class II: Applied Immune Systems, Menlo Park, CA, USA) [21]. According to the literature CD34 selection is hampered by low yields, 35–70% for the laboratory scale methods and 45–50% for the grafting materials [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the possibility of culturing hematopoietic cells in serum‐free medium [22] has provided biochemically defined culture conditions. Several formulae for serum‐depleted media supporting clonogenic growth in semisolid media [23, 24], liquid cultures of bone marrow [25] or expansion of CD34 + cells in liquid culture [26] have been published. In addition, based on various techniques using monoclonal anti‐CD34 antibodies, the CD34 + progenitor cells collected by leukapheresis can be highly enriched to a purity of more than 95%, thus providing ideal targets to assess the effects of cytokines in early hematopoiesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In serum-free culture medium, both CFU-GM and BFUE can be expanded from CD34+ cells in contrast to only CFU-GM in animal serum-containing medium (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%