Direct Ink Writing Technology (3D Printing) of Graphene-Based Ceramic Nanocomposites: A Review

Pinargote, Nestor Washington Solís; Smirnov, Antón; Peretyagin, Nikita; Seleznev, Anton; Peretyagin, Pavel

doi:10.3390/nano10071300

Cited by 102 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 201 publications

(269 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When the ink is extruded and deposited, it can rapidly recover its initial elasticity and storage modulus (G' > G''), exhibits a gel-like state with very high elastic modulus and viscosity, and thus maintains the shape after printing. [35,36] The printable ink for DIW is non Newtonian fluid with a yield stress that can be well described by the Herschel-Bulkley model:…”

Section: Materials Extrusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges

Jin

Kang

et al. 2021

Advanced Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Physical organ models are the objects that replicate the patient-specific anatomy and have played important roles in modern medical diagnosis and disease treatment. 3D printing, as a powerful multi-function manufacturing technology, breaks the limitations of traditional methods and provides a great potential for manufacturing organ models. However, the clinical application of organ model is still in small scale, facing the challenges including high cost, poor mimicking performance and insufficient accuracy. In this review, the mainstream 3D printing technologies are introduced, and the existing manufacturing methods are divided into "directly printing" and "indirectly printing", with an emphasis on choosing suitable techniques and materials. This review also summarizes the ideas to address these challenges and focuses on three points: 1) what are the characteristics and requirements of organ models in different application scenarios, 2) how to choose the suitable 3D printing methods and materials according to different application categories, and 3) how to reduce the cost of organ models and make the process simple and convenient. Moreover, the state-of-the-art in organ models are summarized and the contribution of 3D printed organ models to various surgical procedures is highlighted. Finally, current limitations, evaluation criteria and future perspectives for this emerging area are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Materials Extrusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges

Jin

Kang

et al. 2021

Advanced Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After deposition, the ink is immediately cured into a solid object by different post-processes, such as photopolymerization or thermal curing [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Similar to FDM, DIW is also a high-efficiency method to deposit multi-material printed parts because it is of low cost and can be simply carried out [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. More importantly, DIW exhibits tremendous potential because it is highly suitable for printing a large variety of different functional materials through multiple inkjet heads or nozzles to deposit different materials, including metallic particles [ 99 , 100 , 101 ], ceramic particles [ 102 , 103 , 104 ], extracellular matrices [ 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 ], hydrogels, and elastomers and epoxy thermosets [ 109 , 110 , 111 112 ].…”

Section: Systematic Review Of Current Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing of Polymers

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers has experienced a remarkable increase in interest over the last 20 years. This technology can rapidly design and directly fabricate three-dimensional (3D) parts with multiple materials without complicating manufacturing processes. This research aims to obtain a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the current state of research and reveal challenges and opportunities for future research in the area. To achieve the goal, this study conducts a scientometric analysis and a systematic review of the global research published from 2000 to 2021 on multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers. In the scientometric analysis, a total of 2512 journal papers from the Scopus database were analyzed by evaluating the number of publications, literature coupling, keyword co-occurrence, authorship, and countries/regions activities. By doing so, the main research frame, articles, and topics of this research field were quantitatively determined. Subsequently, an in-depth systematic review is proposed to provide insight into recent advances in multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers in the aspect of technologies and applications, respectively. From the scientometric analysis, a heavy bias was found towards studying materials in this field but also a lack of focus on developing technologies. The future trend is proposed by the systematic review and is discussed in the directions of interfacial bonding strength, printing efficiency, and microscale/nanoscale multi-material 3D printing. This study contributes by providing knowledge for practitioners and researchers to understand the state of the art of multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers and expose its research needs, which can serve both academia and industry.

show abstract

“… Refs. [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] 3D-printing techniques and their characteristics properties: ( A ) Fused deposition modeling (adapted with permission from Akil et al [ 39 ]), ( B ) direct ink writing (adapted with permission from Peretyagin et al [ 40 ]), ( C ) multijet modeling (adapted with permission from Xu et al [ 41 ]), ( D ) two-photon polymerization (adapted with permission from Xu et al [ 42 ]), and ( E ) projection micro-stereolithography (adapted with permission from Zhang et al [ 35 ]). …”

Section: Figures and Schemesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fabrication of Microfluidic Devices for Emulsion Formation by Microstereolithography

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Droplet microfluidics—the art and science of forming droplets—has been revolutionary for high-throughput screening, directed evolution, single-cell sequencing, and material design. However, traditional fabrication techniques for microfluidic devices suffer from several disadvantages, including multistep processing, expensive facilities, and limited three-dimensional (3D) design flexibility. High-resolution additive manufacturing—and in particular, projection micro-stereolithography (PµSL)—provides a promising path for overcoming these drawbacks. Similar to polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidics 20 years ago, 3D printing methods, such as PµSL, have provided a path toward a new era of microfluidic device design. PµSL greatly simplifies the device fabrication process, especially the access to truly 3D geometries, is cost-effective, and it enables multimaterial processing. In this review, we discuss both the basics and recent innovations in PµSL; the material basis with emphasis on custom-made photopolymer formulations; multimaterial 3D printing; and, 3D-printed microfluidic devices for emulsion formation as our focus application. Our goal is to support researchers in setting up their own PµSL system to fabricate tailor-made microfluidics.

show abstract

Direct Ink Writing Technology (3D Printing) of Graphene-Based Ceramic Nanocomposites: A Review

Cited by 102 publications

References 201 publications

3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges

3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges

Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing of Polymers

Fabrication of Microfluidic Devices for Emulsion Formation by Microstereolithography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About