2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct ink writing of three dimensional Ti2AlC porous structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The porous Ti 2 AlC lattices were sintered at 1400°C in argon, resulting in total porosities between 44 and 63 vol%, and mechanical strengths ranging between 43 and 83 MPa. 236 Regarding the 3D porous Cr 2 AlC architectures, MAX phase powders were mixed with polyethylenimine as dispersant, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as thickening agent, and ammonium polyacrylate as flocculant. 126 The resulting ink was extruded by robocasting, followed by a drying process and consolidation by SPS under pressureless conditions.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The porous Ti 2 AlC lattices were sintered at 1400°C in argon, resulting in total porosities between 44 and 63 vol%, and mechanical strengths ranging between 43 and 83 MPa. 236 Regarding the 3D porous Cr 2 AlC architectures, MAX phase powders were mixed with polyethylenimine as dispersant, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as thickening agent, and ammonium polyacrylate as flocculant. 126 The resulting ink was extruded by robocasting, followed by a drying process and consolidation by SPS under pressureless conditions.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robocasting and direct ink writing-based on the same principle -have been used to produce complex 3D structures based on Cr 2 AlC ( Figure 9) and Ti 2 AlC, respectively. 126,236 The processing was described above in Section 4.3 (porous architectures).…”
Section: Near Net Shapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, it can realise the flexible design and manufacture of structural parts with complex shapes, breaking the limitations of the form in traditional ceramic processing technology, and third, it makes personalised designs and structures feasible, to meet the needs of different groups. At present, the main techniques for the additive manufacturing of ceramic parts are as follows: vat photopolymerisation, such as stereolithography (SL) (Jacobs 1992;Chen et al 2010), material jetting, such as inkjet printing (IJP) (Derby 2011;Tan, Tran, and Chua 2016;Saengchairat, Tran, and Chua 2017;Chen, Ouyang, et al 2018), and binder jetting , material extrusion (Tian et al 2017), such as fused deposition manufacturing (FDM) (Danforth 2016;Cano et al 2019) and direct ink writing (DIW) Elsayed et al 2019), powder bed fusion, such as selective laser sintering (SLS) (Yuan, Shen, et al 2019;Chen, Wu, et al 2018) and selective laser melting (SLM) (Minasyan et al 2018;Chen, Li, Wu, et al 2019;Yu et al 2019), and binder jetting, such as three dimensional printing Huang et al 2019). Digital-light-processing (DLP) (Felzmann et al 2012;Mei et al 2019), as a derivative technology of stereolithography, is capable of curing a whole layer in one time period without the need for a laser light source, yet maintaining the high accuracy and surface quality of SL, which can greatly advance printing efficiency and reduce production costs at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%