SAE Technical Paper Series 1999
DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-0170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Injection Gasoline Engines - Combustion and Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of DISI engines reflect in their higher thermal efficiency due to the higher volumetric efficiency of the unthrottled charge, better potential for reducing the specific fuel consumption, and better control of injection quantity and timing (Gao et al, 2005). Significant advancements have been made in recent years in the development of combustion systems for DISI engines which have resulted in larger fuel economy benefits, better exhaust emissions, and significant power advantages compared to throttle-body (TB) and port fuel (PF) injected engines (Kume et al, 1996;Ando;1996, Jackson et al, 1996Itoh et al, 1998;Geiger et al, 1999). DISI engines, however, have their drawbacks due to the time limitations and gasoline direct injection characteristics which may affect the fuel evaporation, charge homogeneity, and the stability of the entire combustion process which lead to an intense cyclic variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The advantages of DISI engines reflect in their higher thermal efficiency due to the higher volumetric efficiency of the unthrottled charge, better potential for reducing the specific fuel consumption, and better control of injection quantity and timing (Gao et al, 2005). Significant advancements have been made in recent years in the development of combustion systems for DISI engines which have resulted in larger fuel economy benefits, better exhaust emissions, and significant power advantages compared to throttle-body (TB) and port fuel (PF) injected engines (Kume et al, 1996;Ando;1996, Jackson et al, 1996Itoh et al, 1998;Geiger et al, 1999). DISI engines, however, have their drawbacks due to the time limitations and gasoline direct injection characteristics which may affect the fuel evaporation, charge homogeneity, and the stability of the entire combustion process which lead to an intense cyclic variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The distance between the injector and the spark plug is large enough for the fuel to evaporate before ignition. This [Geiger et al, 1999].…”
Section: -1-5 Orbitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEV Geiger et al (1999) proposed a charge motion controlled combustion system as shown in the schematic cross-section of the combustion chamber in Figure 2-10. At stratified operation, the mixture formation and charge stratification is controlled by the tumble flow, which is generated by a continuous variable tumble system (CVTS) mounted at the intake port entry.…”
Section: -1-5 Orbitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the three types of typical GDI combustion systems [10], the wall-guided configuration is the least used in recent engine production due to concerns regarding fuel impingement and high THC and particle emissions [11]. However, the wall-guided configuration is still employed and is combined with the air-guided configuration to reduce costs in some systems [12].…”
Section: Development Of Gdi Combustion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%