2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Identification of Zeolite Beta Polymorphs by Solid-State 29Si Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Abstract: Stacking disorder and polymorphism in zeolite and zeolite-like materials hinder their structural characterization. In this work, we propose an advanced approach based on applying "pure shift" solid-state 29 Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy for the structural investigation of zeolitic materials containing intergrown polymorphs. The approach developed in the case study of zeolite beta allows for the resolution of 21 29 Si signals, attributing them to non-equivalent T sites in polymorphs A, B, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Extreme experimental CSs 6,15 (upper and lower values) used for scaling of the calculated shielding values for BEA/A are given in bold. b CS of ±0.05 ppm accuracy.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…). Extreme experimental CSs 6,15 (upper and lower values) used for scaling of the calculated shielding values for BEA/A are given in bold. b CS of ±0.05 ppm accuracy.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to them, we conclude that MAD ε = 0.63 ppm calculated by us for FER (Table S1) S2. The application of two different XRD models allowed avoiding the contradiction between NMR spectra of BEA/A (opposite positions of the 29 Si NMR peaks related to T1 and T2 sites) obtained either by Kolyagin et al 6 and Fyfe et al, 7 on the one hand, or by Marti ́nez-Inẽsta et al, 15 on the other. It also characterizes the sufficient accuracy of the method applied herein.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Accuracy Of The Cs Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations