2015
DOI: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.4.454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Determination of Methicillin Susceptibility From Positive Blood-Culture Bottles in a Bact/ALERT System Using Binax Now S. aureus and PBP2a Tests

Abstract: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with high mortality and morbidity, requiring prompt and appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, it is important to detect methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) rapidly from blood cultures. Two immunochromatographic tests, BinaxNow S. aureus and BinaxNow PBP2a, were directly applied to 79 Bact/Alert bottles that were positive for Gram positive cocci in cluster aggregations. Sensitivity and specificity for the identification of S. aureus and determination o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However antimicrobial susceptibility testing is also essential for selecting the optimal treatment. Rapid resistance testing methods have been introduced in clinical microbiology laboratories for the detection of third generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa or for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. These partial susceptibility tests have been validated for their diagnostic performance although their clinical impact has not been thoroughly assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However antimicrobial susceptibility testing is also essential for selecting the optimal treatment. Rapid resistance testing methods have been introduced in clinical microbiology laboratories for the detection of third generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa or for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. These partial susceptibility tests have been validated for their diagnostic performance although their clinical impact has not been thoroughly assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several Staphylococcus species, such as Staphylococcus epidermis (S. epidermis), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (S. haemolyticus), and the coagulase negative species, have been isolated from ewe's milk and were found to produce one or several staphylococcus enterotoxins [2] and consequently there is a need for methods to specifically discriminate S. aureus from other staphylococci and non-staphylococci as quickly as possible. Conventional identification methods and novel assays based on immunofluorescence probe, DNA microarray, surface enhanced laser desorption and ionization time of flight mass spectrometry, and whole-cell SELEX methods are time-consuming and may yield false-positive or false-negative results, and misclassifications with automated susceptibility testing systems or commercially available latex agglutination kits have been reported recently [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Verigene Test uses a microfluidic cassette to identify 37 different microorganisms employing nanoparticles 1723 and BinaxNOW is an immunochromatographic assay for a variety of infectious agents (methicillin-resistant S. aureus , E. coli , Streptococcus pneumoniae , etc.). 24 Both of these methods are destructive, meaning the final product cannot be used for further diagnostic testing. Accelerate Diagnostics also uses positive blood culture for their diagnostic instrument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%