2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2018.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct identification of bovine mastitis pathogens by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry in pre-incubated milk

Abstract: The present study aimed to compare two MALDI-TOF identification methods [(a) direct sample identification after pre-incubation; or (b) use of bacteria isolated on pre-culture)] to standard, traditional bench microbiology. A total of 120 quarter milk samples from 40 Holstein lactating cows were screened based on culture-positive results obtained by microbiological culture (reference method) with the following numbers of quarters positive per cow: 4 cows with 1, 8 cows with 2, 12 cows with 3 and 16 cows with 4 i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…half (31) of these 60 samples. Statistical analysis with McNemar and Cohen’s kappa tests confirm the absence of any significant difference with a fair agreement between the qPCR and the MALDI‐TOF results, similarly to other recently published studies, although these were based on milk samples instead of isolates (Barreiro et al, ; Wilson et al, ). The reasons for the differences in the qualitative and quantitative results can be several, some dealing with the sampling method, others with the multiplex qPCR assays and still others with the bacterial growth or the MALDI‐TOF MS identification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…half (31) of these 60 samples. Statistical analysis with McNemar and Cohen’s kappa tests confirm the absence of any significant difference with a fair agreement between the qPCR and the MALDI‐TOF results, similarly to other recently published studies, although these were based on milk samples instead of isolates (Barreiro et al, ; Wilson et al, ). The reasons for the differences in the qualitative and quantitative results can be several, some dealing with the sampling method, others with the multiplex qPCR assays and still others with the bacterial growth or the MALDI‐TOF MS identification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Nevertheless, prior isolation of M. bovis on specific solid medium is still necessary, and final identification can take up to 10 days (10,18,19). To reduce sample turnaround time, at present, there is great interest in the identification of bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS directly from the sample or after a short enrichment period in liquid broth as is already done for urine, blood, milk, and BALf specimens (20)(21)(22)(23). However, such a technique is currently not available for Mycoplasma spp., presumably because of difficulties such as their fastidious growth and overgrowth by other bacteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolated bacteria were identified by MALDI-TOF MS as described previously [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The direct colony method, which involves the application of bacterial colonies from growth plates directly onto the steel plate before testing by MALDI-TOF MS, was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%