2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct glutathione quantification in human blood by LC–MS/MS: comparison with HPLC with electrochemical detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline for GSSG was noisier in both standards and blanks; however, with a response factor more than 5 times greater than GSH, the LOD and LOQ were 0.5 and 1.6 nM, respectively, or 39 and 120 fmol of analyte on-column. Among the assays in which GSH is not derivatized [11,27,28,33,[35][36][37], the LOD and LOQ for the assay presented here are second lowest, bettered only by Robin and coworkers, who achieved LOD values equivalent to 8 and 7 fmol on-column for GSSG and GSH, respectively, using postcolumn reaction with silver ions [35]. The linear ranges for GSH and GSSG cover three orders of magnitude, making this assay comparable to other assays using underivatized glutathione.…”
Section: Selection and Identification Of Multiple Reaction Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline for GSSG was noisier in both standards and blanks; however, with a response factor more than 5 times greater than GSH, the LOD and LOQ were 0.5 and 1.6 nM, respectively, or 39 and 120 fmol of analyte on-column. Among the assays in which GSH is not derivatized [11,27,28,33,[35][36][37], the LOD and LOQ for the assay presented here are second lowest, bettered only by Robin and coworkers, who achieved LOD values equivalent to 8 and 7 fmol on-column for GSSG and GSH, respectively, using postcolumn reaction with silver ions [35]. The linear ranges for GSH and GSSG cover three orders of magnitude, making this assay comparable to other assays using underivatized glutathione.…”
Section: Selection and Identification Of Multiple Reaction Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A study of GSH and GSSG ratios in whole blood and red blood cell samples by Rossi and coworkers determined that the use of strong acids, such as trichloroacetic acid and sulfosalicylic acid, to precipitate protein acidified the supernatant and minimized GSH oxidation [26]. Other authors have confirmed the limited stability in whole blood [11,27] and mouse liver tissue [28]. Supernatant samples collected in triplicate over the course of 1 day were reproducible, with relative standard deviations under 6% for GSH and under 9% for GSSG, showing no sign of oxidative degradation over the course of the data collection.…”
Section: Chromatographic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSH and GSSG were measured by LC-MS/MS method on whole blood, after proteins precipitation with trichloroacetic acid [42]. Levels of GSH and GSSG were expressed as μ mol/g Hb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A resulting overproduction of GSSG (GSH oxidation), which often occurs during alkalization and derivatization phase, is the major disadvantage of such sample preparation protocol [9,10]. Although liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the technique of choice for the simultaneous determination of GSH and GSSG (taking into consideration specificity and low limits of detection and quantification), it is inaccessible to many laboratories [11][12][13]. Other methods, such as micellar electrokinetic capillary electrophoresis (MEKC) [14], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [15], fluorescence [16], and chemiluminescence-based methods, have also been proposed [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%