2010
DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Gene Therapy for Bone Regeneration: Gene Delivery, Animal Models, and Outcome Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, inconsistent results due to single outliers failed to show statistically significant differences. This insignificant therapeutic effect was found in numerous studies, which demonstrated non-viral gene transfer as a safe but relative inefficient strategy to increase bone growth [10,12,13]. Results of this study highlight the importance of promoting non-viral gene transfer by alternative methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, inconsistent results due to single outliers failed to show statistically significant differences. This insignificant therapeutic effect was found in numerous studies, which demonstrated non-viral gene transfer as a safe but relative inefficient strategy to increase bone growth [10,12,13]. Results of this study highlight the importance of promoting non-viral gene transfer by alternative methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Viral delivery of DNA vectors to the target tissue was shown to be highly effective but could result in a fatal immune response of the host [10,11]. In contrast non-viral gene transfer using plasmids is regarded as a relatively safe but inefficient strategy [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of viral and non-viral vectors for tissue engineering has been reviewed elsewhere [47][48][49] but advantages and disadvantages of the particular expression systems are important to note. Viral vectors -as the name suggests -are derived from viruses (i.e.…”
Section: General Aspects Of Various Dna Delivery Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ transfection indicates that miRNAs exist within the scaffold structure prior to the addition of cells; these scaffolds are implanted "cell-free" in the tissue void, where they will interact with the resident and homing cells to regenerate such defects. [105] The scaffold acts as a depot for the complexes and then infiltrating cells establish contact with these along the structure of the scaffolds to internalize them and become transfected. On the contrary, ex situ transfection consists in first administering the miRNA treatment to a controlled cell population, which is then mixed with or seeded onto the relevant scaffold.…”
Section: Scaffolds For Microrna Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%