2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.04.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct fit of extended Hartree–Fock approximate correlation energy model to spectroscopic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, we judge the fit of the present work as quite satisfactory particularly because it does not involve any fitting to the observed vibrational data. Moreover, it may provide the required input for later improvement to true spectroscopy accuracy either via a direct fit 114,133,134 to spectroscopic data or by morphing the current PES with a spectroscopically accurate local potential via energy-switching. 112,135,136 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, we judge the fit of the present work as quite satisfactory particularly because it does not involve any fitting to the observed vibrational data. Moreover, it may provide the required input for later improvement to true spectroscopy accuracy either via a direct fit 114,133,134 to spectroscopic data or by morphing the current PES with a spectroscopically accurate local potential via energy-switching. 112,135,136 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, we should have in mind that only the first 23 vibrational levels have been counted for the statistics. We recall that a direct least-squares fit [25] to 90 ro-vibrational spectroscopic term values [26] and the 23 RKR points reported by Krupenie [24], let to an O 2 potential that reproduces the input data with a rmsd of 0.6 cm À1 for the 90 ro-vibrational energies (1.4 cm À1 with respect to the 18 vibrational energies), and 22 cm À1 for the RKR points. Somewhat coincidentally, perhaps, we obtain a rmsd of similar order of magnitude from our CS N /USTE(T, Q) curves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of CH1, the long‐range portion of the PEF included only the leading dispersion coefficient, C 6 . In the present work, two successive dispersion energy coefficients, C 8 and C 10 , were estimated employing the formula, Cn=C6κnR01.57(n6)/2, where κ 8 = 1.00, κ 10 = 1.13, and R 0 is the Le Roy radius. The Le Roy radius for the ground electronic state of HI is R 0 = 4.53 Å, and C 6 = 2.28 × 10 5 Å 6 cm −1 , taken from CH1.…”
Section: Applications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%