2014
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.583385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Evidence of an Elongation Factor-Tu/Ts·GTP·Aminoacyl-tRNA Quaternary Complex

Abstract: Background: Elongation factor-Tu (EF-Tu) chaperones aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) to the elongating ribosome as a ternary complex with GTP. Results: EF-Ts facilitates EF-Tu⅐GTP binding to aa-tRNA through direct, transient interactions. Conclusion: EF-Ts accelerates the formation and decay of ternary complex through the formation of a transient EF-Tu/ Ts⅐GTP⅐aa-tRNA quaternary complex. Significance: These newly described interactions of EF-Ts may serve to regulate ternary complex abundance in the cell.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in excellent agreement with kinetic studies in the bacterial system where GTP hydrolysis has been shown to be a very fast step, whereas tRNA accommodation and especially EF-Tu dissociation are rate-limiting during tRNA selection (Pape et al, 1998). Furthermore, our results rationalize recent studies on the formation and turnover of bacterial EF-Tu • GXP • EF-Ts • aa-tRNA quarternary complexes (Burnett et al, 2014; 2013), which proposed a novel role of EF-Ts in promoting release of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu • GDP. The presence of a second proofreading state containing A/T-tRNA, but lacking density for eEF1A, implies that also tRNA accommodation constitutes a second slow step after eEF1 A dissociation, in agreement with the hypothesis that necessary conformational changes in the tRNA elbow to allow A/T to A/A transition resemble a stochastic trial-and-error process and not a concerted pathway (Whitford et al, 2010; Geggier et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is in excellent agreement with kinetic studies in the bacterial system where GTP hydrolysis has been shown to be a very fast step, whereas tRNA accommodation and especially EF-Tu dissociation are rate-limiting during tRNA selection (Pape et al, 1998). Furthermore, our results rationalize recent studies on the formation and turnover of bacterial EF-Tu • GXP • EF-Ts • aa-tRNA quarternary complexes (Burnett et al, 2014; 2013), which proposed a novel role of EF-Ts in promoting release of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu • GDP. The presence of a second proofreading state containing A/T-tRNA, but lacking density for eEF1A, implies that also tRNA accommodation constitutes a second slow step after eEF1 A dissociation, in agreement with the hypothesis that necessary conformational changes in the tRNA elbow to allow A/T to A/A transition resemble a stochastic trial-and-error process and not a concerted pathway (Whitford et al, 2010; Geggier et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This model is supported by recent work from Blanchard and colleagues, who have shown that EF-Ts promotes both the association and dissociation of tRNA from EF-Tu (29). This activity is concomitant to yet distinct from the well-described GEF function of EF-Ts (30). Knudsen and colleagues recently suggested that the coiled-coil domain of EF-Ts, and in particular its conserved basic patch (including Arg219), could promote tRNA loading onto EF-Tu (31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…By contrast, CdiA-CT NC101 activity is not detected in vitro unless both EF-Ts and EF-Tu are present. Despite this discrepancy, we propose that EF-Ts stimulates the activity of each toxin by increasing steady-state GTP·EF-Tu·aa-tRNA substrate levels as described by Blanchard and colleagues ( 68 , 69 ). Though EF-Tu has nanomolar affinity for aa-tRNA at 0–4°C ( 70 ), these interactions are estimated to be 20- to 30-fold weaker at 37°C ( 71 , 72 ), indicating that the dissociation constants approach the micromolar range under the conditions used here to monitor in vitro tRNase activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%