2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006gl026723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct estimation of the Rayleigh wave phase velocity in microtremors

Abstract: [1] We present a new estimation technique using a circular array for the Rayleigh wave phase velocity in microtremors. This technique allows us to employ more flexible sensor arrangements than that of Aki's spatial autocorrelation(SPAC) technique. One of the features is that the array output is represented by simultaneous equations consisting of complex coherence functions(CCFs). A CCF consists of two components:the Bessel function J 0 (!r/c)(w:angular frequency, r:radius, c:phase velocity) and an error term t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase velocity is inversely proportional to the derivative of the cross-coherence phase with respect to frequency. We assumed that CCFs can be expressed as the superposition of the Bessel function J 0 (·) and an angle-dependent error term [13]. Averaging over angle between the reference receiver and the rest of the array reduced the error term significantly.…”
Section: Overview Of Wave Dispersion Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase velocity is inversely proportional to the derivative of the cross-coherence phase with respect to frequency. We assumed that CCFs can be expressed as the superposition of the Bessel function J 0 (·) and an angle-dependent error term [13]. Averaging over angle between the reference receiver and the rest of the array reduced the error term significantly.…”
Section: Overview Of Wave Dispersion Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His derivation pathway is, however, different from ours, and does not easily provide an interface with the general theory of directional aliasing which we present below. Shiraishi et al [2006] also arrived at a similar expression, but they relied on the strong premise that waves arrive from a finite number of discrete azimuths.…”
Section: Theoretical Evaluation Of Error Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slight deviations from the circular and equidistant seismic‐array configuration tend to pose few serious obstacles to the use of the SPAC method. Attempts have been made, in recent years, to make use of seismic arrays of irregular shapes [e.g., Bettig et al , 2001; Ohori et al , 2002; Maresca et al , 2006; Shiraishi et al , 2006; Köhler et al , 2007]. The most extreme case is that of an array of just two seismic sensors, with one sensor around the circumference plus another at its center, which has reportedly produced reasonable results [e.g., Aki , 1957; Morikawa et al , 2004; Chávez‐García and Luzón , 2005; Chávez‐García et al , 2005, 2006, 2007a, 2007b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Aki ( 1957 ) proposed a new approach to estimate phase velocities of surface waves, spatial auto-correlation (SPAC) method has been a very useful tool to estimate ground structure because of its simple post-process (Aki 1957 ). After that, many researchers both in and out of Japan continued to publish papers to extend Aki’s theory and developed a variety of array methods (Okada 2003 ; Morikawa et al 2004 ; Cho et al 2006 ; Chávez-García et al 2005 , 2007 ; Shiraishi et al 2006 ; Tada et al 2009 ). However, all those improved methods are based on the assumption that the layers under surface are horizontal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%