2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Equilibrium Dialysis Compared with Two Non-dialysis Free T4 Methods in Premature Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may argue against its accuracy in determining FT 4 levels, considering that some TBG-deficient patients were falsely detected to have low FT 4 levels and that the equilibrium dialysis method is the gold standard (15,16). However, it has been difficult to introduce the equilibrium dialysis method in newborn screening because it requires a larger volume serum sample and longer measurement times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One may argue against its accuracy in determining FT 4 levels, considering that some TBG-deficient patients were falsely detected to have low FT 4 levels and that the equilibrium dialysis method is the gold standard (15,16). However, it has been difficult to introduce the equilibrium dialysis method in newborn screening because it requires a larger volume serum sample and longer measurement times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of ten patients with CH-C categorized into isolated CH-C (group I; patients [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and those with undetermined pituitary involvement (group U; patients 23 and 24). CH-C in Kanagawa prefecture as 1 in 30 833 births (24/740 003).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For assay of FT4, with the caveat of measurement under conditions of low-binding proteins, direct equilibrium dialysis methods are considered the 'gold standard' 25 as other immunoassays can show bias according to proteinbound TT4, to serum TT4 binding capacity, 26,27 to inherent methodological variation 28 or to comparison to inappropriate reference ranges. 28 To determine the impact of serum TT4 binding capacity on the FT4 measurements, a French study 27 compared the FT4 measured by direct equilibrium 27 Overall, although there was variation within groups, the biases between each of the immunoassays and direct equilibrium dialysis according to serum binding capacity were significant, although generally small for the normal and high serum binding capacity groups, but significant and appreciable with the low serum binding capacity group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 To determine the impact of serum TT4 binding capacity on the FT4 measurements, a French study 27 compared the FT4 measured by direct equilibrium 27 Overall, although there was variation within groups, the biases between each of the immunoassays and direct equilibrium dialysis according to serum binding capacity were significant, although generally small for the normal and high serum binding capacity groups, but significant and appreciable with the low serum binding capacity group. Similarly, the concordance between FT4 measurements with direct equilibrium dialysis and each of the binding capacity groups; for normal and high serum binding capacity groups the range of concordance was between 59 -96% and 66 -90%, respectively, but for the low serum binding capacity group the range was 31-69%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruce Wilcox 1* and Jerald C. Nelson 2 There have been, and continue to be, reports of discordant free thyroxine (T 4 ) 3 measurements when different free-T 4 methods are applied to the same serum samples (1)(2)(3)(4). Our laboratory has attempted to identify some of the factors that contribute to these disparities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%