1993
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/14.9.1733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct enzymic detection of endogenous oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA

Abstract: The endogenous production of oxidative damage in DNA by free radicals released as a by-product of respiration is a likely cause of mutations which, if they occur in appropriate genes, may lead to cancer. Using an endonuclease specific for oxidized pyrimidines, in conjunction with the highly sensitive method of single cell gel electrophoresis, we have detected significant oxidative damage in untreated, freshly isolated lymphocytes from normal, healthy individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
328
0
11

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 764 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
328
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…To test this idea directly, we performed Fpg (formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase) comet assays, which measure oxidative DNA lesions 25 . C57Bl/6 MEFs passaged in 20% oxygen for 10-14 days accumulated 3-4-fold more oxidative DNA damage than parallel cultures passaged in 3% oxygen (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this idea directly, we performed Fpg (formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase) comet assays, which measure oxidative DNA lesions 25 . C57Bl/6 MEFs passaged in 20% oxygen for 10-14 days accumulated 3-4-fold more oxidative DNA damage than parallel cultures passaged in 3% oxygen (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the modified alkaline comet assay described by Collins et al (1993) to increase the sensitivity of the assay by additionally measuring the oxidised pyrimidine or purine bases. The Endo III and the FPG enzymes recognize oxidatively damaged pyrimidines and purines, respectively, and nick the DNA at these sites creating single-strand breaks, which can be detected by the comet assay, thus increasing the sensitivity of the assay (Collins et al, 1993). In this study, the levels of DNA damage detected by basic and modified comet assay were significantly higher in breast cancer patients than controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA damage biomarkers were measured in the MNC using the alkaline comet assay (Singh et al, 1988) and the modified comet assay (Collins et al, 1993) as described below.…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…apurinic) sites in cells exposed to genotoxic carcinogens [15]. In this study, we did not use a modified comet assay with a purified DNA repair enzyme, formamidopyrimidine DNA-glycosylase (FPG), even though this method is more sensitive than the assay for detecting FPG-sensitive sites than our classic comet assay [31,32]. However, FPG is one of the multifunctional DNA repair enzymes participating in base excision repair [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%