“…Without analysing the image characteristics or the pixel statistics required in the present hybrid imaging mode for such features as contrast and resolution, which have been discussed earlier in detail (Fotino, 1982, hereafter quoted as I), it could be argued that this mode is inefficient because only one pixel is collected at any given moment and consequently that high radiation damage is caused to the specimen. It should be stressed that, far from being envisaged as a general substitute for visualization by fluorescent screens or photographic film, image formation by sequential pixel acquisition appears nevertheless of interest: (i) when used in many applications involving amorphous or crystalline objects and in a majority of routine biological specimens not much affected by high beam exposure, (ii) when restricted to small areas of radiation-sensitive biological specimens and thus not entailing a large accumulation of beam-induced effects, (iii) when accompanied by special experimental procedures (such as cryoprotectants, low-temperature imaging or radiationresistant negative staining embedment) aimed at reducing or alleviating the radiation damage, or (iv) when accompanied by worthwhile compensations deriving from the electronic versatility.…”