2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct discontinuous Galerkin method for nonlinear reaction–diffusion systems in pattern formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turing in his seminal paper [1] presented a consistent account of the details and mathematical formalism showing that reaction-diffusion systems can be responsible for the emergence of pattern formation in nature. It has become an attractive area of research for scholars in applied mathematics [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] to investigate and quantify the behaviour of a set of reaction-diffusion equations as an evolving dynamical system. Systems of reaction-diffusion equations that model the evolution of pattern formation in nature are often a set of non-linear parabolic equations [5,7,9,10,17,18,21,23], whose solution is seldom analytically retrievable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turing in his seminal paper [1] presented a consistent account of the details and mathematical formalism showing that reaction-diffusion systems can be responsible for the emergence of pattern formation in nature. It has become an attractive area of research for scholars in applied mathematics [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] to investigate and quantify the behaviour of a set of reaction-diffusion equations as an evolving dynamical system. Systems of reaction-diffusion equations that model the evolution of pattern formation in nature are often a set of non-linear parabolic equations [5,7,9,10,17,18,21,23], whose solution is seldom analytically retrievable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the Schnakenberg equations on the unit square domain = [0, 1] × [0, 1] with homogenous Neumann boundary conditions applied to both u and v as before [67]. Let the parameter values be determined by a = 0.1305, b = 0.7695, d 1 = 0.05, d 2 = 1 and γ = 100.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [69], discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element methods, coupled with Strang type symmetrical operator splitting methods, have been used for solving reaction-diffusion systems in domains with complex geometry. The authors of [67] have presented numerical solutions of Schnakenberg model and chlorite-iodidemalonic acid (CIMA) reactive model, by combining direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG) finite element method with implicit integration factor (IIF) time integration method. In [10], variational multiscale element-free Galerkin (VMEFG) and local discontinuous Galerkin (LDG) methods have been applied for solving two-dimensional Brusselator reactiondiffusion system with and without cross-diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar method was extended in [7] to solve the compressible miscible displacement problem. The DGFE techniques have been applied by the authors of this paper [13,14,23,24], to nonlinear partial differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%