2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.24.113498
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct digital sensing of protein biomarkers in solution

Abstract: Highly sensitive detection of proteins is of central importance to biomolecular analysis and diagnostics. Conventional protein sensing assays, such as ELISAs, remain reliant on surface-immobilization of target molecules and multi-step washing protocols for the removal of unbound affinity reagents. These features constrain parameter space in assay design, resulting in fundamental limitations due to the underlying thermodynamics and kinetics of the immunoprobe–analyte interaction. Here, we present a new experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pair of points allows us to construct the tie-line by connecting them with gradient k calculated as (figure 3A). Experimentally, we attached florescent tags to FUS and G3BP1 proteins and used a home-built confocal setup [25] to determine the photon count intensity from the dilute phase, which directly relate to the protein concentration (the conversion is not necessary since the value does not enter the tie-line expression); a microfluidic device was used to trap the phase separating systems in water-in-oil droplets so that measurements could be carried out without surface effects (figure 3B, 3C and Appendix B 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This pair of points allows us to construct the tie-line by connecting them with gradient k calculated as (figure 3A). Experimentally, we attached florescent tags to FUS and G3BP1 proteins and used a home-built confocal setup [25] to determine the photon count intensity from the dilute phase, which directly relate to the protein concentration (the conversion is not necessary since the value does not enter the tie-line expression); a microfluidic device was used to trap the phase separating systems in water-in-oil droplets so that measurements could be carried out without surface effects (figure 3B, 3C and Appendix B 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of tie-lines requires a robust method for measuring dilute phase concentrations of proteins in heterogeneous mixtures of condensates and soluble monomer. In order to carry out these measurements, we utilised a droplet microfluidic technique in which we created microdroplets containing the desired concentrations of protein and co-polymer and then measured these droplets on a home-built confocal setup [25]. In brief a 488 laser line is coupled into a 60x-magnification water-immersion objective (CFI Plan Apochromat WI 60x, NA 1.2, Nikon) and emitted photons are directed onto an avalanche photodiode (APD), a motorised XYZ stage is mounted on top of the objective so that a microfluidic device may be monitored throughout the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an independent probe for the presence of such species, we turned to confocal detection under flow by using Microfluidic confocal spectroscopy (MCS). This is a brightness-based method that combines microfluidic mixing and flow with confocal detection (33)(34)(35). MCS measurements are sensitive to the presence of species that span a broad size range from tens to hundreds of nanometers, and due to convective flow, is not reliant on diffusion alone for sampling species of different sizes in solution (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Mesoscale Clusters Are Of Low Overall Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the microscope is equipped with a 488-nm laser line (Cobolt 06-MLD, Hübner Photonics, Derby, UK) and a single-photon counting avalanche photo diode (SPCM-14, PerkinElmer, Seer Green, UK) for subsequent detection of emitted fluorescence photons. Further details of the optical unit have been described previously 53 . Diffusion profile recording was done by continuously moving the confocal observation volume through the centre four channels of the microfluidic device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%