2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct differentiation method for response sensitivity analysis of structures in fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, we focus on planar elements so that the firestructure interaction can be well approximated by considering the heat source to be within the structural plane. The fire-structure interaction is usually assessed on three levels in a computational procedure: (i) the fire simulation is achieved using the well-established techniques from computational fluid dynamics, (ii) in the next level the fire is introduced as a heat source applied inside the domain and/or on its boundaries, and (iii) finally, the thermo-mechanical behavior of the elements is evaluated using a numerical approach such as the FEM, see for example Guo and Jeffers 1 and McGrattan et al 2 and further references are therein. In the current work, we look into the last level where the fire is introduced as a single or multiple heat sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, we focus on planar elements so that the firestructure interaction can be well approximated by considering the heat source to be within the structural plane. The fire-structure interaction is usually assessed on three levels in a computational procedure: (i) the fire simulation is achieved using the well-established techniques from computational fluid dynamics, (ii) in the next level the fire is introduced as a heat source applied inside the domain and/or on its boundaries, and (iii) finally, the thermo-mechanical behavior of the elements is evaluated using a numerical approach such as the FEM, see for example Guo and Jeffers 1 and McGrattan et al 2 and further references are therein. In the current work, we look into the last level where the fire is introduced as a single or multiple heat sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DDM has been applied successfully to frame finite elements including the displacement‐based, force‐based, and mixed variational formulations for material nonlinearity, the corotational formulation for large displacement analysis of frames , and the geometrically nonlinear force‐based formulation . Multiphysics applications involving structural finite element analysis to which the DDM has been applied include fire attack and fluid–structure interaction . Higher level modules of finite element analyses also require the DDM, for example, multi‐point constraint handling by the penalty, transformation, and Lagrange multiplier methods .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical approaches to DDM sensitivity analysis for structural response under mechanical loads have been well developed (Kleiber et al 1997) and extended to material and geometric nonlinear formulations of frame-element response (Scott et al 2004;Conte et al 2004) as well as frame-element geometry and cross-section dimensions (Haukaas and Scott 2006;Scott and Filippou 2007). The DDM has also been applied to composites processing (Bebamzadeh et al 2010) and fire attack on structures (Guo and Jeffers 2014); however, its application to FSI has not been addressed. This is partly due to the complexity of the computation for the FSI response and the cumbersome nature of staggered computational approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%