2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct determination of the electronic structure of the poly(3-hexylthiophene):phenyl-[6,6]-C61 butyric acid methyl ester blend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

38
169
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
38
169
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our EQE measurements indicate the transport gap and optical gap for the polymers considered differ by <0.1 eV, explaining facile dissociation of excitons into free carriers. This result is consistent with previous transient photoconductivity results from Heeger and co-workers (37,39), but differs substantially from those obtained from photophysical experiments, such as ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS)/inverse photoemission spectroscopy (IPES) (40). Therefore, the relevance of these photophysical experiments in interpreting device performance needs to be reconciled in future work on this topic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Second, our EQE measurements indicate the transport gap and optical gap for the polymers considered differ by <0.1 eV, explaining facile dissociation of excitons into free carriers. This result is consistent with previous transient photoconductivity results from Heeger and co-workers (37,39), but differs substantially from those obtained from photophysical experiments, such as ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS)/inverse photoemission spectroscopy (IPES) (40). Therefore, the relevance of these photophysical experiments in interpreting device performance needs to be reconciled in future work on this topic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[9,17,18] 2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoro-7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (F4TCNQ) with its LUMO located at ~ 5.24 eV [19] should then be a strong p-type dopant upon mixing with the host polymers [9,17] (crystalline) regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) (rr-P3HT, HOMO ~ 4.65 eV) and (amorphous) poly [2,3- Several studies find that energy level alignment at organic/electrode and organic/organic interfaces plays a critical role in multilayer stack device, nearly dominating the performance. [20][21][22][23][24] Typically, the energy level alignment of such interfaces follows the trends predicted by the so-called integer charge transfer (ICT) model, i.e. three distinct regimes where the Fermi level is either pinned to negative/positive interface polarons or vacuum level alignment holds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,[30][31][32] Even if the determination of energy levels is done with one consistent method in pristine materials, the results may not be transferable to blend films and devices, because effects such as aggregation, crystallization and interface dipoles can shift energy levels by up to 0.5 eV. [33][34][35][36][37] These uncertainties in energy levels are relevant for material design rules and for the estimation of efficiency potentials as done by Scharber et al 15 The present paper uses electroluminescence (EL) and photoluminescence (PL) measurements of polymer:fullerene devices and films to study the relationship between interfacial energetics and charge generation and recombination. EL spectroscopy probes the emissive states directly in working devices and allows a quantitative determination of the energy of the CT state by measuring its emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%