Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017 American Control Conference (ACC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2017.7962984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct data-driven control design through set-membership errors-in-variables identification techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First let us introduce the time-varying feasible controller set (FCS), which is inspired by the feasible parameter set (FPS) for LTV systems proposed in [26] and the FCS definition for LTI controllers presented in [23]. The time-varying FCS, for the case of LTV systems, is defined as follows.…”
Section: Adaptive Ddc For Ltv Systems In the Set-membership Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First let us introduce the time-varying feasible controller set (FCS), which is inspired by the feasible parameter set (FPS) for LTV systems proposed in [26] and the FCS definition for LTI controllers presented in [23]. The time-varying FCS, for the case of LTV systems, is defined as follows.…”
Section: Adaptive Ddc For Ltv Systems In the Set-membership Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K * (t) is the ideal controller and follows the same definition as in [23]. Now thanks to (29), Equation ( 27) becomes…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the ∆ A and ∆ y are exactly known if the properties of the transmitter are known. Within the automatic control framework, the UBB paradigm is exploited and studied in EIV system identification [40], state estimation [1], model predictive control [3,36], direct data-driven control [13], and factor analysis [14]. In these applications, the error bound can be estimated either from previous information on the model and on the measurement devices or from available training datasets.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, with respect to classic VRFT, our method has the merit to provide theoretical stability conditions, by only enforcing linear constraints on the controller gain in the design phase. Note that in [35], [36] a non-iterative direct data-driven control approach which relies on SM errors-in-variables identification techniques is proposed. However, such an approach is inspired by a different direct method, i.e., the correlation based tuning framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%