Mass spectrometry analysis can be performed by introducing samples directly to mass spectrometry, allowing the increase of the analysis throughput; however, some disadvantages of direct-to-mass spectrometry analysis include susceptibility to matrix effects and risk of instrument contamination from inadequate sample preparation. Solid-phase microextraction is one of the most suitable sample preparation methods for direct-to-mass spectrometry analysis, as it offers matrix-compatible coatings which ensure analyte enrichment with minimal or no interference from matrix. One of the ways solidphase microextraction can be coupled directly to mass spectrometry is via a microfluidic open interface. This manuscript reports improvements made to the initial microfluidic open interface design, where the system components have been simplified to mostly commercially available materials. In addition, the analysis of samples has been automated by implementing software that fully controls the analysis workflow, where the washing procedure is optimized to completely reduce the carryover. Herein, the extraction and desorption time profiles from thin and thick SPME devices was studied where the overall workflow consisted of high-throughput sample preparation of 1.3 min per 96 samples and <1 min per sample instrumental analysis.M ass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful technology for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of samples applied in food, environmental, forensic, proteomics, and biological analysis, among other fields. 1−4 Thus, chromatographic techniques (e.g., LC) coupled with MS became a gold standard for quantitative and qualitative analysis of various complex samples. The outstanding performance of LC-MS can be achieved with adequate sample preparation and a separation step. 5 Due to recent improvements in the mass spectrometer, it can analyze complex samples directly to MS without chromatography, even under ambient conditions. 1 The most significant advantage of direct MS over chromatography coupled to MS is the circumvention of the typically lengthy separation step that does not allow for high-throughput or rapid analysis. Recent direct MS applications include the analysis of in vivo, 6 biological, 7 pharmaceutical, 8 food samples, 9 and other fields. The disadvantage of directly introducing samples to MS for the analysis of complex samples is the introduction of an enormous amount of matrix components that can interfere with or suppress the analyte's signal. Hence, coupling an appropriate sample preparation method to the overall workflow is crucial for the sensitivity of the overall direct-to-MS analysis and the mass spectrometer stability and cleanliness.