2006
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00005906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct costs of three models for the screening of latent tuberculosis infection

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to compare the direct costs of three models for detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in routine clinical practice in Switzerland.Comparison of the overall costs of screening for LTBI, including medical and radiological examination, and preventive treatment associated with three screening models was carried out. Model 1 relies only on the tuberculin skin test (TST) according to the current national guidelines, model 2 relies on T-SPOT1.TB (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fact that most of the costs for TB control are incurred during diagnosis and treatment of patients with active TB suggests that higher diagnostic sensitivity and higher specificity could induce cost savings in the medium and long term by reducing the future burden of cases of active TB and decreasing the number of uninfected BCG-vaccinated people inappropriately treated for LTBI (18). Studies in Switzerland and Germany have shown that the most cost-effective method for LTBI screening is the two-step strategy (TST followed by IGRA in TST-positive patients) (53,54). The cost-effectiveness of this strategy is probably related to low prevalence of LTBI and high prevalence of BCG history in these countries.…”
Section: The Ifn-␥ Release Assays: Advantages Over the Tstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fact that most of the costs for TB control are incurred during diagnosis and treatment of patients with active TB suggests that higher diagnostic sensitivity and higher specificity could induce cost savings in the medium and long term by reducing the future burden of cases of active TB and decreasing the number of uninfected BCG-vaccinated people inappropriately treated for LTBI (18). Studies in Switzerland and Germany have shown that the most cost-effective method for LTBI screening is the two-step strategy (TST followed by IGRA in TST-positive patients) (53,54). The cost-effectiveness of this strategy is probably related to low prevalence of LTBI and high prevalence of BCG history in these countries.…”
Section: The Ifn-␥ Release Assays: Advantages Over the Tstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs of LTBI testing and treatment were recently published in a cost minimisation study from the Swiss healthcare perspective [9]. Asymptomatic infection is assumed to produce no cost (except the cost of testing, which would have been incurred irrespective of infection).…”
Section: Costs Of Ltbi Screening and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs of testing comprised the labour cost for the staff performing the TST or drawing blood, as well as the material cost of the vial and associated consumables for each TST at CHF 35 (J23). As reimbursement has not yet been formalised for the T-SPOT.TB test in Switzerland, an estimate for the total cost of the screening kit, reagents and laboratory fees was taken as CHF 200 (J129) for each T-SPOT.TB test as previously described [9].…”
Section: Costs Of Ltbi Screening and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[165,166] Wrighton-Smith found similar results, suggesting that sequential testing of TST followed by IGRA may be a more cost-effective strategy. [167] On the other hand, Oxlade found that IGRA was the least cost-effective strategy for testing of immigrants. [157] Little research has been done looking at the effect of IGRA on the cost-effectiveness of targeted testing programs in other heterogeneous, low-prevalence populations.…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Of Screening Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%