2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2011.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct contact test for estimating the ecotoxicity of aerosol samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the toxicity value of Cu 2+ was the highest in 30 minutes, while it was seen that the toxicity value was decreased as the exposure time increased in other samples (3,5 -DCA and aniline). Toxicity was measured with ToxAlert 100 and Flash in the study of Kovats et al [37]. It was found that the luminescent bacterium test (Microtox/ToxAlert) turbidity and color of the sample might cause a significant decrease of light output due to physical effects, creating the potential for false-positives.…”
Section: Comparison Of Acute Toxicity Tests With Each Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the toxicity value of Cu 2+ was the highest in 30 minutes, while it was seen that the toxicity value was decreased as the exposure time increased in other samples (3,5 -DCA and aniline). Toxicity was measured with ToxAlert 100 and Flash in the study of Kovats et al [37]. It was found that the luminescent bacterium test (Microtox/ToxAlert) turbidity and color of the sample might cause a significant decrease of light output due to physical effects, creating the potential for false-positives.…”
Section: Comparison Of Acute Toxicity Tests With Each Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the studies assessing ecotoxicological effects of combustion particles, either extracts in water or DMSO were used for testing [25, 66-69, 91, 92] or the filters were directly used (either grounded or as inserts in well plates) for exposing the bacteria [7,23,24,90,93].…”
Section: Overview On Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling times were 2 h. In the case of emission samples both the conditions of sampling and the short sampling times ensure that the contribution of ambient PM is practically negligible. Since aerosol samples are collected on filters and ecotoxicity is to be measured in aqueous suspensions, a novel sample preparation protocol was developed (Kováts et al, 2012). 2 mg of resuspended road dust samples were weighted with a microbalance (10 µg sensitivity) into 4 ml pre-weighted vials.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently we have developed a simple method for the direct assessment of the overall ecotoxicity of PM 2.5 / PM 10 (Kováts et al, 2012). This method is based on the kinetic version of the Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition bioassay (Lappalainen et al, 1999) that has recently been standardized for the assessment of coloured suspensions such as sludge or sediment (ISO 21338:2010: Water quality -Kinetic determination of the inhibitory effects of sediment, other solids and coloured samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri /kinetic luminescent bacteria test/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%