2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009gl039995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct connectivity between upstream and downstream promotes rapid response of lower coastal‐plain rivers to land‐use change

Abstract: [1] Low-relief fluvial systems that originate in the lower coastal plain and discharge into estuaries are common along passive margins. These watersheds are thought to be disconnected from their termini by floodplains, which buffer the sediment-routing system by sequestration. Here, we present a detailed study of the Newport River, a typical lower coastal-plain system, which reveals high connectivity between watershed and delta. Connectivity is measured as the time lag between initiation of a silviculture oper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayhead deltas are very sensitive to changes in sedimentation and accommodation, thus, human alterations within watersheds greatly affect bayhead delta evolution (Nichols et al, 1986). Increased erosion in the watershed associated with deforestation, or land-use change, increases sediment supply (Ver et al, 1999;Hupp et al, 2009a;Mattheus et al, 2009), while construction of impoundments effectively restrict sediment delivery to the river mouth (Meade, 1982;Jaffe et al, 2007). Previous studies report bayhead deltas retreat rapidly (backstep) in response to a small increase in the rate of sea-level rise (Rodriguez et al, 2010), but the rate of retreat can also decrease as sediment supply increases or when transgression is confined by an abrupt increase of valley gradient at tributary junctions (Simms and Rodriguez, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayhead deltas are very sensitive to changes in sedimentation and accommodation, thus, human alterations within watersheds greatly affect bayhead delta evolution (Nichols et al, 1986). Increased erosion in the watershed associated with deforestation, or land-use change, increases sediment supply (Ver et al, 1999;Hupp et al, 2009a;Mattheus et al, 2009), while construction of impoundments effectively restrict sediment delivery to the river mouth (Meade, 1982;Jaffe et al, 2007). Previous studies report bayhead deltas retreat rapidly (backstep) in response to a small increase in the rate of sea-level rise (Rodriguez et al, 2010), but the rate of retreat can also decrease as sediment supply increases or when transgression is confined by an abrupt increase of valley gradient at tributary junctions (Simms and Rodriguez, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the estuarine saltmarsh shoreline, which acts as a natural buffer to over-land sediment flow, developed land has a higher potential to increase suspended sediment load to the system through direct runoff from the land. Mattheus et al (2009) showed rapid accretion along the Newport River Bayhead delta front as the result of runoff from a large silviculture operation directly adjacent to the watershed. That increase in sedimentation rate occurred between 1964 and 1967, just as suddenly as what we measured at CLB (Mattheus et al, 2009).…”
Section: Potential Estuarine Sediment Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mattheus et al (2009) showed rapid accretion along the Newport River Bayhead delta front as the result of runoff from a large silviculture operation directly adjacent to the watershed. That increase in sedimentation rate occurred between 1964 and 1967, just as suddenly as what we measured at CLB (Mattheus et al, 2009). Another land-use change in the area has been farming.…”
Section: Potential Estuarine Sediment Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deforestation occurred especially early in our study area: the town of Rowley passed laws restricting tree cutting in 1660 (Gage, 1840) and nearly 98% of Ipswich's forest was cut by 1831 (Tarule, 2004). Deforestation in the watersheds of small coastal rivers leads to large changes in estuarine sedimentation rates with little lag time (Mattheus et al, 2009).…”
Section: Historical Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%