2012
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct comparison of the cognitive effects of acute alcohol with the morning after a normal night's drinking

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to compare performance measures after acute alcohol consumption (intoxication) with the performance the day after a normal night's drinking (hangover). Methods Eighty‐four social drinkers took part in two studies that followed a counterbalanced repeated measure design. Fifteen men and 33 women were tested the morning (09:00, 11:00 or 13:00 h) following normal/usual alcohol consumption and the morning after no alcohol consumption; the order of testing was counterbalanced. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…between group design of the current study. In line with the current study, McKinney et al (2012) also observed significantly slower response times on the Stroop task and Eriksen's flanker test. They found no significant differences between hangover and control condition on a spatial attention test (which was not included in the current study).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…between group design of the current study. In line with the current study, McKinney et al (2012) also observed significantly slower response times on the Stroop task and Eriksen's flanker test. They found no significant differences between hangover and control condition on a spatial attention test (which was not included in the current study).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Studies with divided attention test of longer duration (e.g., 15 min or more) did show significantly more tracking errors in the hangover state (Roehrs, Yoon, & Roth, ). A previous study from our institute using the same divided attention task (McKinney, Coyle, & Verster, ) did find significantly slower response times in the hangover condition. A possible explanation for this discrepancy in results may be the fact that the study by McKinney et al () applied a within subjects design as opposed to the between group design of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the large amount of information provided by the literature, the majority of studies include broader age ranges and they encompass several developmental stages, such as youth (Grattan-Miscio and Vogel-Sprott, 2005; Schweizer et al, 2006; Day et al, 2013), adulthood (Dougherty et al, 2000; Weissenborn and Duka, 2003; Moulton et al, 2005; Söderlund et al, 2005; Paulus et al, 2006; Brumback et al, 2007; Rose and Duka, 2007; Saults et al, 2007; Cash et al, 2015), as well as older adults (Boha et al, 2009; Leitz et al, 2009; Bisby et al, 2010a,b; Montgomery et al, 2011; Poltavski et al, 2011; Wetherill and Fromme, 2011; McKinney et al, 2012; Hoffman and Nixon, 2015; Weafer et al, 2016). Besides the mnesic impact of acute BD, there are also studies showing effects of BD history in Spanish binge drinkers (Parada et al, 2011b; Sanhueza et al, 2011; Mota et al, 2013; Carbia et al, 2017) and international population (Squeglia et al, 2011; Campanella et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%