2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct comparison of clinical diagnostic sensitivity of saliva from buccal swabs versus combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our patients, repeated nasopharyngeal swabs were negative for SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR, but these negative results on nasopharyngeal swabs are clearly insufficient to rule out COVID-19 diagnosis [2]. We strongly recommend the use of lower respiratory tract specimen testing for the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunosuppressed patients, in case of clinical and/or radiological suspicion [11]. Morandi et al evaluated the additional value of lower respiratory tract sampling in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection with available chest CT scan and at least two negative nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In our patients, repeated nasopharyngeal swabs were negative for SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR, but these negative results on nasopharyngeal swabs are clearly insufficient to rule out COVID-19 diagnosis [2]. We strongly recommend the use of lower respiratory tract specimen testing for the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunosuppressed patients, in case of clinical and/or radiological suspicion [11]. Morandi et al evaluated the additional value of lower respiratory tract sampling in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection with available chest CT scan and at least two negative nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…If buccal swabs or oral specimens are used for SARS-CoV-2 testing, it is recommended to collect them fasting in the morning before food intake, drinking, or brushing teeth, to increase the overall sensitivity. Importantly, the positivity rate would further decrease when other, less sensitive test methods such as rapid antigen tests are used [ 38 ], and when the patient is not instructed correctly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these constraints, alternative nucleic acid amplification methodologies, such as reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and microarray technologies, can be employed to devise cost-effective, expeditious, and efficient detection approaches. 14,15 On the other hand, serological assays, including multiplex immunoassays (MIA), enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA), and chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs), for antibody detection have gained immense attention in asymptomatic patients as well as post-infection. 16…”
Section: Introduction: a Demi-decade In Combatting The Sars-cov-2 Out...mentioning
confidence: 99%