2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.80.022507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct calculation of excited-state electronic energies and two-electron reduced density matrices from the anti-Hermitian contracted Schrödinger equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…II C we give the differential equations with which, as demonstrated in Ref. 24, the ACSE can be solved for excited states.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…II C we give the differential equations with which, as demonstrated in Ref. 24, the ACSE can be solved for excited states.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the ACSE with an initial MCSCF 2-RDM can treat strong multireference correlation effects, [22][23][24] Consider an N-electron, high-spin triplet wave function ⌽͑N͒ represented in a basis of r spatial orbitals ͕ i ͖. The spin properties of the high-spin triplet ⌽͑N͒ are…”
Section: B Solving the Acse For Open-shell Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Recently, two general approaches to the direct calculation of the 2-RDM have emerged: ͑i͒ the minimization of the ground-state energy as a variational functional of a 2-RDM that is constrained by a set of necessary N-representability conditions [6][7][8][9][10][11] and ͑ii͒ the solution of the contracted Schrödinger equation, particularly its antiHermitian part, to determine ground-or excited-state 2-RDMs. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] A variant of the variational 2-RDM method has been developed in which 2-RDM is parametrized by single-and double-excitation coefficients; importantly, the parametrization is selected to yield not only energies that scale linearly with system size ͑size extensive͒ but also 2-RDMs that satisfy known N-representability conditions. [21][22][23][24][25][26] Two distinct parametrizations have been designed: ͑i͒ Kollmar 21 proposed a method ͑K͒ that is derived from inspecting the D, Q, and G conditions for N-representability, and ͑ii͒ one of the authors, 25 stressing the balanced treatment of particles and holes, proposed a parametrization ͑M͒ that is derived from the D and Q conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he violation, we show, provides a sufficient condition fo r the openness o f any many-electron quantum system that is computable from knowledge o f only the I-RDM. In principle, the 1-RDM can be com puted from experim ent [12], com putation [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], or any com bination o f experim ent and com putation. H ere we dem onstrate this condition through calculations o f exciton dynam ics in photosynthetic light harvesting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%