1988
DOI: 10.1271/bbb1961.52.2655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct bioelectrocatalysis at electrodes modified with D-gluconate dehydrogenase.

Abstract: D-Gluconate dehydrogenase isolated from Pseudomonas fluorescens was immobilized on the surfaces of carbon and gold electrodes by irreversible adsorption. The electrodes with the adsorbed enzyme produced anodic currents in solutions containing D-gluconate. The currents were at

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the deviation from the straight line at increased x 1/2 is ascribed to the interfacial electron transfer kinetic limitation in part. Such behavior has been frequently observed in enzyme-catalyzed electrochemical systems without mediators [36][37][38][39][40][41] and has been explained by a model that there exists a wide distribution in the standard interfacial electron transfer rate constant due to the random orientation of adsorbed enzyme on the electrode surface and that large overpotential is needed to exceed the enzymatic turnover rate constant for disordered enzyme molecules exhibiting longer electron tunneling distance between active site in enzyme and electrode surface, where the current is expressed by the summation of the contribution from the catalytic reactions of all enzymes on the electrode surface [38,41]. The interfacial electron transfer rate (tunneling distance) would also depend on the microscopic surface structures such as crevices and asperities.…”
Section: Laccase-catalyzed Electrochemical Reduction Of Oxygenmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Therefore, the deviation from the straight line at increased x 1/2 is ascribed to the interfacial electron transfer kinetic limitation in part. Such behavior has been frequently observed in enzyme-catalyzed electrochemical systems without mediators [36][37][38][39][40][41] and has been explained by a model that there exists a wide distribution in the standard interfacial electron transfer rate constant due to the random orientation of adsorbed enzyme on the electrode surface and that large overpotential is needed to exceed the enzymatic turnover rate constant for disordered enzyme molecules exhibiting longer electron tunneling distance between active site in enzyme and electrode surface, where the current is expressed by the summation of the contribution from the catalytic reactions of all enzymes on the electrode surface [38,41]. The interfacial electron transfer rate (tunneling distance) would also depend on the microscopic surface structures such as crevices and asperities.…”
Section: Laccase-catalyzed Electrochemical Reduction Of Oxygenmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The current appeared to increase with the electrode potential. Such situations have been reported in the literature on DET bioelectrocatalysis [11,12,[52][53][54][55], and the potential-dependent linear increase in the catalytic current is ascribed to the wide spectrum of surface electrode kinetics due to random orientation of the adsorbed enzymes [54][55][56]. Differences in orientation cause the differences in the distance between the redox site of adsorbed enzymes and electrodes.…”
Section: Catalytic Activity Of M510l and M510q Cueosmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The experimental evidence of DET has been reported in the literature for both low molecular weight electrontransfer proteins and enzymes with large, more complicated structures such as laccase, peroxidase, and glucose oxidase [1, 9 -11, 18, 24]. The DET has been observed with multicofactor redox enzymes, such as flavohemeprotein gluconate dehydrogenase [12] and quinohemoproteins [13]. For alcohol dehydrogenase and fructose dehydrogenase the DET between the electrode and active site of the enzyme has been reported [14 -17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%