Abstract:High-dislocated hip dysplasia is challenging to treat with total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach (DAA). The DAA has potential advantages including optimizing component positioning, enhanced hip stability, and a more rapid postoperative recovery. We present a surgical technique for DAA total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia that includes preoperative planning, soft tissue releases, subtrochanteric osteotomy, component placement, and intraoperative nerve monitoring and imaging. This technique… Show more
“…2 A). The dysplastic acetabulum was reconstructed by either structural bone autograft or porous metal augment 14 . And the acetabular component was placed at the true hip center regardless of deformity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ). The specific methods in soft tissue release and limb length equalization were reported in our previous publication 14 . Figure 1 Preoperative planning and surgical treatment of a 37-year-old male patient diagnosed as Crowe type IV DDH by DAA THA combining STO.…”
It is challenging to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) classified Crowe III-IV using direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), and very little is known on its outcome. This study aimed to investigate the clinical result in this defined disorder with DAA versus posterolateral approach. Twenty-three consecutive hips with Crowe III-IV DDH who underwent DAA were retrospectively evaluated from 2016 through 2018. Outcomes were primarily assessed by HHS, WOMAC, and SF-12 physical scales. The second evaluations included leg length discrepancy, hip muscle strength, radiographic review, complications, and limp recovery. Results were compared to a control cohort of 50 hips underwent posterolateral THA concurrently within the observational period. At last follow-up (DAA 28.5 months; PLA 39.0 months), the mean increase of the HHS for DAA was 48.2 and 30.3 for PLA (p = 0.003). The improvement in WOMAC score in DAA cohort was 15.89 higher that of the PLA cohort after adjusting preoperative difference [R2 = 0.532, P = 0.000, 95% CI (10.037, 21.735)]. DAA had more rapid recovery of hip abductor strength at 1-month (p = 0.03) and hip flexor strength at 3 months (p = 0.007) compared to PLA. No significant differences were found in the radiographic analysis with the exception of increased acetabular anteversion in the DAA cohort (p = 0.036). Satisfactory improvement in limp, indicated by the percentage of limp graded as none and mild to the total, was much higher in DAA cohort (97.6%), compared to that of PLA cohort (90.0%, p = 0.032). DAA for high-dislocated dysplasia demonstrate a significant improvement in clinical result comparable to posterolateral approach. Improved clinical outcome in terms of increased HHS and WOMAC scores, rapid recovery of hip abductor and flexor strength, and enhanced limp recovery without an increased risk in complications, could be acquired when the surgeons were specialized in this approach.
“…2 A). The dysplastic acetabulum was reconstructed by either structural bone autograft or porous metal augment 14 . And the acetabular component was placed at the true hip center regardless of deformity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ). The specific methods in soft tissue release and limb length equalization were reported in our previous publication 14 . Figure 1 Preoperative planning and surgical treatment of a 37-year-old male patient diagnosed as Crowe type IV DDH by DAA THA combining STO.…”
It is challenging to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) classified Crowe III-IV using direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), and very little is known on its outcome. This study aimed to investigate the clinical result in this defined disorder with DAA versus posterolateral approach. Twenty-three consecutive hips with Crowe III-IV DDH who underwent DAA were retrospectively evaluated from 2016 through 2018. Outcomes were primarily assessed by HHS, WOMAC, and SF-12 physical scales. The second evaluations included leg length discrepancy, hip muscle strength, radiographic review, complications, and limp recovery. Results were compared to a control cohort of 50 hips underwent posterolateral THA concurrently within the observational period. At last follow-up (DAA 28.5 months; PLA 39.0 months), the mean increase of the HHS for DAA was 48.2 and 30.3 for PLA (p = 0.003). The improvement in WOMAC score in DAA cohort was 15.89 higher that of the PLA cohort after adjusting preoperative difference [R2 = 0.532, P = 0.000, 95% CI (10.037, 21.735)]. DAA had more rapid recovery of hip abductor strength at 1-month (p = 0.03) and hip flexor strength at 3 months (p = 0.007) compared to PLA. No significant differences were found in the radiographic analysis with the exception of increased acetabular anteversion in the DAA cohort (p = 0.036). Satisfactory improvement in limp, indicated by the percentage of limp graded as none and mild to the total, was much higher in DAA cohort (97.6%), compared to that of PLA cohort (90.0%, p = 0.032). DAA for high-dislocated dysplasia demonstrate a significant improvement in clinical result comparable to posterolateral approach. Improved clinical outcome in terms of increased HHS and WOMAC scores, rapid recovery of hip abductor and flexor strength, and enhanced limp recovery without an increased risk in complications, could be acquired when the surgeons were specialized in this approach.
“…Intraoperative fractures are likely to occur in 5.2%-26.8% of THA in cases of DDH [37][38][39][40]. Otherwise, if the femoral canal is too narrow to allow the insertion of the smallest stem, splitting of the femur, as proposed by Li et al [27], is an alternative.…”
The reconstruction of the hip joint in patients suffering from developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) is a demanding procedure and presents many challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. Higher rates of mechanical complications are present in this group of patients. The results of cemented and uncemented implants used in DDH patients are very promising, according to recent outcomes. However, the surgeon has to be aware of several complications, in order to establish an uneventful surgical management of DDH. The specific article investigates the technical challenges and clinical results of total hip arthroplasty in patients with DDH.
“…The dysplastic acetabulum was reconstructed by either structural bone autograft or porous metal augment. 14 And the acetabular component was placed at the true hip center regardless of deformity. A transverse subtrochanteric osteotomy (STO) was indicated for anatomic or functional equalization of the lower limb depending on the compensatory mechanism of the pelvic and lumbar complex, 15 or to prevent sciatic nerve injury secondary to over-lengthening of the leg (Fig.…”
Aims It is challenging to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) classified Crowe III-IV using direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), and very little is known on its outcome. This study aimed to investigate the clinical result in this defined disorder with DAA versus posterolateral approach.Methods Twenty-three consecutive hips with Crowe III-IV DDH who underwent DAA were retrospectively evaluated from 2016 through 2018. Outcomes were primarily assessed by HHS, WOMAC, and SF-12 physical scales. The second evaluations included leg length discrepancy, hip muscle strength, radiographic review, complications, and limp recovery. Results were compared to a control cohort of 50 hips underwent posterolateral THA concurrently within the observational period.Results At last follow-up (DAA 28.5 months; PLA 39.0 months), the mean increase of the HHS for DAA was 48.2 and 30.3 for PLA (p = 0.003). The improvement in WOMAC score in DAA cohort was 15.89 higher that of the PLA cohort after adjusting preoperative difference [R2 = 0.532, P = 0.000, 95%CI (10.037, 21.735)]. DAA had more rapid recovery of hip abductor strength at 1-month (p = 0.03) and hip flexor strength at 3 months (p = 0.007) compared to PLA. No significant differences were found in the radiographic analysis with the exception of increased acetabular anteversion in the DAA cohort (p = 0.036). Satisfactory improvement in limp, indicated by the percentage of limp graded as none and mild to the total, was much higher in DAA cohort (97.6%), compared to that of PLA cohort (90.0%, p = 0.032).Conclusions DAA for high-dislocated dysplasia demonstrate a significant improvement in clinical result comparable to posterolateral approach. Improved clinical outcome in terms of increased HHS and WOMAC scores, rapid recovery of hip abductor and flexor strength, and enhanced limp recovery without an increased risk in complications, could be acquired when the surgeons were specialized in this approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
