2012
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and specific chemical control of eukaryotic translation with a synthetic RNA–protein interaction

Abstract: Sequence-specific RNA–protein interactions, though commonly used in biological systems to regulate translation, are challenging to selectively modulate. Here, we demonstrate the use of a chemically-inducible RNA–protein interaction to regulate eukaryotic translation. By genetically encoding Tet Repressor protein (TetR)-binding RNA elements into the 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) of an mRNA, translation of a downstream coding sequence is directly controlled by TetR and tetracycline analogs. In endogenous and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5C and Table 2). These dissociation constants were similar to those previously measured for the isolated aptamer [24], [25]. Notably, no binding was observed in the absence of a functional TetR aptamer (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5C and Table 2). These dissociation constants were similar to those previously measured for the isolated aptamer [24], [25]. Notably, no binding was observed in the absence of a functional TetR aptamer (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2C and [25]]. Therefore, we tested whether using a highly structured 5′UTR RNA element that can decrease the efficiency with which vYFPΔ_ 5–1.2 is translated would improve its localization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural small molecule-RNA interactions operate as transcript-embedded riboswitches that fine-tune ligand-inducible transcription and translation of target genes 12 , whereas natural ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes provide structural assemblies enabling translational repression (MS2 stem-loop-MS2 coat protein 13 ), ribosome scaffolding (C/Dbox-L7Ae protein 14 ), antitermination control (nutR-boxB-N-peptide 15 ), RNAi 16 and RNA-guided splicing 17 . Many natural RNPs have served as blueprints for the design of synthetic protein-controlled RNA-based gene switches that inhibit translation when engineered into the 5′ UTR of eukaryotic mRNAs [18][19][20] , modulate splicing upon detection of disease markers 21 and use NF-κB to control short hairpin RNA processing 22 . A new level of synthetic translation control was put into practice by transcript-embedded hammerhead ribozymes (HHRs), which directly cleave mammalian mRNAs and irreversibly inhibit translation 23 . HHRs consist of three stem-loop structures that form a three-way junction surrounding the catalytic core 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2a] There are many natural and engineered versions of gene switches that respond to an enormous variety of chemical input signals (e.g.a ntibiotics, [19] metabolites, [20] and other disease-related signals [21] ), biological signals (proteins [22] and nucleic acids [23] ), and even physical signals (light [24] and temperature; [25] Table 2). [2a] There are many natural and engineered versions of gene switches that respond to an enormous variety of chemical input signals (e.g.a ntibiotics, [19] metabolites, [20] and other disease-related signals [21] ), biological signals (proteins [22] and nucleic acids [23] ), and even physical signals (light [24] and temperature; [25] Table 2).…”
Section: Gene Switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%