2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2013.6739743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and indirect social robot interactions in a hotel public space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, many studies have tested the performance of various social robots in service encounters (e.g. at information desks [24,32,40], information broadcasting [26,27], bellboy tasks [28], and customer feedback gathering [7]).…”
Section: Background and Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, many studies have tested the performance of various social robots in service encounters (e.g. at information desks [24,32,40], information broadcasting [26,27], bellboy tasks [28], and customer feedback gathering [7]).…”
Section: Background and Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that impressions about interactions with social robots are affected by various factors (e.g. the number of robots [26,27], gender differences [8]). Similarly, in practical situations various factors may affect the impression of the interaction.…”
Section: Research Questions Addressed By This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Users would like NAO to be more emotionally expressive, responsive, and have a natural voice and gesturing (Anastasiou et al, 2013;Ahmad et al, 2017). Authors used a variety of questionnaires to evaluate NAO's characteristics and performance based on: anthropomorphism (Zlotowski et al, 2014;Kraus et al, 2016), user experience (Alenljung et al, 2018;Olde Keizer et al, 2019), user acceptability (Ahmad et al, 2017), robot personality (Liles and Beer, 2015;Peters et al, 2017;Kraus et al, 2018), robot behaviors (Pan et al, 2013;Njeri et al, 2016;Rossi et al, 2019), user expectations and evaluation (Anastasiou et al, 2013;Henkel et al, 2019), and perceived trustworthiness (Jessup et al, 2019). Table 4 presents common questionnaires that are used in evaluating human-oriented perception of NAO.…”
Section: The Human Perception Of Naomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With technological advancements, social robots have demonstrated highly developed abilities [1,2] and have increasingly performed service tasks in the hospitality sector [3][4][5][6][7]. Service robots can facilitate decision-making processes and perform a variety of tasks [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%