1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00021449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and indirect selection for grain yield in oats (avena sativa L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the yield of cereals can also be defined as the product of crop growth rate, crop growth duration and harvest index (TAKEDA and FREY 1976), a formula which also uses growth parameters, as with the separation of grain yield into the product of grain filling rate and grain filling duration. These growth parameters may be useful as a selection criterion as has been demonstrated by HELSEI, and SKRDLA (1983) and JOHNSON et al (1983) for vegetative growth rates in oats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the yield of cereals can also be defined as the product of crop growth rate, crop growth duration and harvest index (TAKEDA and FREY 1976), a formula which also uses growth parameters, as with the separation of grain yield into the product of grain filling rate and grain filling duration. These growth parameters may be useful as a selection criterion as has been demonstrated by HELSEI, and SKRDLA (1983) and JOHNSON et al (1983) for vegetative growth rates in oats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For oats, genetic variation in vegetative growth rates were observed for different gene pools and growing conditions (e.g. TAKEDA et al 1979, JOHNSON et al 1983, GUPTA et al 1987, PELTONBN-SAINIO 1993). This variation has even been significantly increased by introducing genes from A. sterilis (TAKEDA and FREY 1977).…”
Section: Genetic Variances In Growth Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations among harvest index, grain yield and biological yield, therefore, have been investigated by many authors using very different agricultural crops. Only some selected publications on these topics shall be mentioned here: THURLING (1974), CAMPBELL and KONDRA (1978), DEGENHART andKoNDRA (1981, 1984), SERNYK and STEFANSSON (1983), JENKINS and LEITCH (1986), GROSSE (1989) with rapeseed; SINGH and STOSKOPF (1971), RosiELLE andFREY (1975 a, 1975 b), TAKIDA and FREY (1976), TAKEDA and FREY (1977), TAKEDA et al (1979), TAKEDA et al (1980), JOHNSON et al (1983) with oat; SINGH and STOSKOPE (1971), SYME (1972), NASS (1973), FISCHER and KERTESZ (1976), DONALD and HAMBLIN (1976), BHATT (1977), AUSTIN et al (1980), BLASL (1982), FEIL (1987), MALIK et al (1988) with wheat; SINGH and STOSKOPF (1971), DONALD and HAMBLIN (1976), RIGGS et al (1981aRIGGS et al ( , 1981b, BLASL (1982) with barley; BLASL (1982), RUSSELL (1985) with maize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, sib families. Seven commercial oat cultivars were included in Johnson et al (1983) compared direct selection for ineach set in duplicate. Each set also included five of the original creasing grain yield to indirect selection using vegetative parental lines, which were assigned to sets at random, and the growth rate on F 2 -derived oat lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%