Direct and Indirect Impacts of Housing Tenure Mix on Antisocial Behavior: A Study of Hong Kong’s Private Housing Communities

Abstract

The problem of antisocial behavior (ASB) undermines the life quality of urban residents. While many previous studies on ASB focused on the solutions, little effort has been dedicated to finding out the social determinants of the levels of ASB problems in private housing communities, especially in high-rise residential settings in Asian cities. Previous empirical research suggests that ASB seriousness can be a function of poor neighborliness, community detachment and management efficacy. Yet, the link between housing tenure mix and ASB problems has been underexplored in the literature. In this light, a multilevel design with hierarchical modeling was employed to test the hypothesized direct and indirect (moderation) effects of housing tenure mix on the perceived seriousness of ASB in neighborhoods. The dataset came from a structured questionnaire survey of 592 residents living in 17 private high-rise housing communities in Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong. The results indicated that the seriousness of the ASB problem was largely dependent on poor neighborliness and community detachment. A higher level of renting in a housing community was also found to amplify perceived ASB seriousness, and enhance the influence of poor neighborliness on ASB seriousness. The research findings highlight the importance of tenure mix in predicting the degree of ASB proliferation in a housing community.

Neighbourhoods in shaping migrant integration: A study of peri-urban Beijing

“…In contrast, empirical studies show that mixed neighbourhoods actually exclude interclass communication (e.g., Méreiné-Berki et al, 2021;Schuermans et al, 2015) and even lead to antisocial behaviours (e.g., Baum et al, 2015;Odgers et al, 2015;Yau, 2020). It seems that residing together does not necessarily generate social interaction and integration (Bolt and Van Kempen, 2013).…”

Including the majority: Examining the local social interactions of renters in four case study condominiums in Sydney

“…So, the library is really, really great. -Tara, Bay Park renter, 25-34 Destination spaces inside complexes such as rooftop gardens and swimming pools were free to use, and regular users had developed chatting ties with other residents in these spaces, supporting calls for the inclusion of such spaces in complexes (e.g., Hirvonen & Lilius, 2019;Yau, 2020). The fact that these spaces were only accessible to residents also meant users could assume a commonality (shared residence) and expect to see one another againresidents were therefore more receptive to interaction in these spaces.…”

Personal attitude or experience? Which factors influence residents’ acceptance of mixed-income communities?

“…It could lead to social distance between the lower- and higher-income groups or even the rejection of affluence among the poor as seen in some stigmatized French neighborhoods [ 11 ], possibly resulting in stronger social resistance from certain social classes that exceeds the level of hostility involved in ethnic segmentation [ 32 ]. It could also disrupt social networks and local institutional support for the disadvantaged and subject them to destabilization and social inter-group conflict in socially-mixed communities [ 12 , 20 , 21 ]. This does not mean that the values of social mix strategy should be abandoned; however, it is important to rethink its adoption, particularly from the bottom up, with attention to residents’ recognition and acceptability.…”