2003
DOI: 10.1177/1094670503005004007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and Indirect Effects of Commitment to a Service Employee on the Intention to Stay

Abstract: The article presents a model for understanding the role of customers' commitment to service employees and their intention to stay with the firm. The model consists of two kinds of commitment—calculative and affective—to both the service employee and the service firm. The model is tested with a sample of bank customers. The findings support the direct effect of commitment to service employees on commitment to the service firm and the indirect effect on intention to stay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(48 reference statements)
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we differentiate attitudinal and behavioral loyalty. Attitudinal loyalty is grounded in liking and a positive psychological attachment to the firm, whereas behavioral loyalty refers to the act of staying with the firm or intentions to do so (Dick and Basu 1994;Fullerton 2003;Hansen, Sandvik, and Selnes 2003;Oliver 1997;Yi and Jeon 2003). Because a positive attitude toward the firm or its offerings is usually a precursor of behavioral loyalty, we expect a positive relationship between attitudinal and behavioral loyalty (Dick and Basu 1994;Gruen, Summers, and Acito 2000;Verhoef 2003):…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we differentiate attitudinal and behavioral loyalty. Attitudinal loyalty is grounded in liking and a positive psychological attachment to the firm, whereas behavioral loyalty refers to the act of staying with the firm or intentions to do so (Dick and Basu 1994;Fullerton 2003;Hansen, Sandvik, and Selnes 2003;Oliver 1997;Yi and Jeon 2003). Because a positive attitude toward the firm or its offerings is usually a precursor of behavioral loyalty, we expect a positive relationship between attitudinal and behavioral loyalty (Dick and Basu 1994;Gruen, Summers, and Acito 2000;Verhoef 2003):…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marketing literature indicates that an employees' service performance (e.g., good interpersonal skills; employees' credibility) positively impacts customer satisfaction and loyalty (Alge et al, 2002;Hansen, Sandvik, and Selnes, 2003). Bowen and Schneider (1988) noted three defining characteristics of service: intangibility, simultaneous production and consumption, and customer co-production.…”
Section: Relationships Among Service Orientation Employee Service Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotions shape behaviors and perceptions and play a crucial role in the development of different kinds of relationships (Andersen & Kumar, 2006;Johnson et al, 2006), because these cannot be built on behavior alone (Barnes, 2003). Rather than total rationalizing, customers' behavior is also based on emotional bonds that go beyond core product attributes, involving enjoyment, personal meaning, and a feeling of gratitude, the currency of relationships (Hansen, Sandvik, & Selnes, 2003;Styles & Ambler, 2003). Emotional content (Berscheid, Snyder, & Omoto, 1989) could be the path to attaining true customer intimacy, the backbone of rewarding relationships (Fournier, 1998).…”
Section: The Research: Reassessing Relationships In Consumer Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%