2008
DOI: 10.1126/science.1148310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and Indirect Effects of Resource Quality on Food Web Structure

Abstract: The diversity and complexity of food webs (the networks of feeding relationships within an ecological community) are considered to be important factors determining ecosystem function and stability. However, the biological processes driving these factors are poorly understood. Resource quality affects species interactions by limiting energy transfer to consumers and their predators, affecting life history and morphological traits. We show that differences in plant traits affect the structure of an entire food w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
199
4
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
199
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has also been shown that plant resource quality can mediate interactions involving plants, herbivores and their parasitoids [11], by producing larger herbivore hosts, which can provide a better quality resource [12] and thus be preferred [13]. Consequently, recent studies have shown that bottom-up changes to host and parasitoid body size contributed, alongside density-mediated effects, to overall changes in food-web structure [14,15]. In addition to sizerelated host preferences, parasitoid body size may affect dispersal and search ability, whereas host body size can be inversely correlated with abundance [3], and these two factors may affect encounter rates and food-web structure [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has also been shown that plant resource quality can mediate interactions involving plants, herbivores and their parasitoids [11], by producing larger herbivore hosts, which can provide a better quality resource [12] and thus be preferred [13]. Consequently, recent studies have shown that bottom-up changes to host and parasitoid body size contributed, alongside density-mediated effects, to overall changes in food-web structure [14,15]. In addition to sizerelated host preferences, parasitoid body size may affect dispersal and search ability, whereas host body size can be inversely correlated with abundance [3], and these two factors may affect encounter rates and food-web structure [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They account for variation in link magnitude and energetic importance of each species in a community. Increasingly used in the last decade, these methods have been shown to provide a powerful tool with which to explore the structure of ecological communities and their responses to environmental factors that may not be revealed by analyses of species richness per se [9,[31][32][33][34]. Here, we analysed four of these quantitative metrics (generality, vulnerability, interaction diversity, linkage density) as well as the mortality rates of primary and hyperparasitoids to test the functional significance of these descriptors and their response to decline in landscape complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we used measures based on Shannon information theory [12], as described in Bersier et al [13] and adapted for host-parasitoid webs [2], which use the densities of species and the frequency of interactions: (i) parasitoid diversity, which is equal to species richness when all species are equally abundant but takes on smaller values when abundances are uneven; (ii) link evenness, which equals one when all trophic links have equal frequencies and asymptotically approaches zero for highly uneven frequencies; and (iii) quantitative realized connectance, which is the observed link diversity as a proportion of maximum possible link diversity and is a measure of the complexity of the network. Since secondary parasitoids cannot be unambiguously linked to primary parasitoids [10], we calculated all the food web metrics separately for the aphid-primary parasitoid and the aphid-secondary parasitoid matrices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity and complexity of such food webs are considered to be important factors that determine ecosystem function and stability. Insect hostparasitoid systems are influenced by plant traits, which can lead to large effects on food web structure [2]. Due to their biology, interactions between aphids, primary parasitoids and secondary parasitoids can easily be quantified and have proven to be a useful system for exploring multi-trophic interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation