2009
DOI: 10.1021/jp9085798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and Indirect Detachment in the Iodide−Pyrrole Cluster Anion: The Role of Dipole Bound and Neutral Cluster States

Abstract: Photoelectron imaging probes both molecular electronic structure and electron molecule interactions. In the current work images were recorded for detachment from the I(-) x C(4)H(5)N (I(-) x pyrrole) cluster anion at wavelengths between 360 and 260 nm. The direct detachment spectra show strong similarities to those of I(-), although a strong solvent shift, broadening and some structure is observed. A nondirect, dissociative or autodetachment feature is also observed over a range of wavelengths. Ab initio calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The location of the channel II threshold is approximately 0.94 eV above the channel I threshold, although the precise separation between the two channels is complicated by the interaction of the molecular moiety with the iodine atom. 5,23 The branching ratio of photoelectrons detached via the two channels (Figs. 2 and 3 right hand ordinate, open circles) shows the onset of channel II.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The location of the channel II threshold is approximately 0.94 eV above the channel I threshold, although the precise separation between the two channels is complicated by the interaction of the molecular moiety with the iodine atom. 5,23 The branching ratio of photoelectrons detached via the two channels (Figs. 2 and 3 right hand ordinate, open circles) shows the onset of channel II.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 However, comparison with free I − detachment at excitation energies away from the channel II threshold suggests that under those conditions there is only a minor effect on the angular distribution. [4][5][6] To date, only I − · CH 3 Br and I − · CH 3 I PADs have been observed to show a strong deviation from those of I − detachment at photon energies more than 100 meV below the channel II threshold. [2][3][4]9 These deviations are largely attributable to the effect of a low-lying anionic σ * state associated with the methyl halide molecule rather than the long range electrondipole interaction.…”
Section: Correlation Between μ X and β Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…58,[63][64][65][66][67][68] In these cases, the change in ␤ can be explained through consideration of the dominant long range term in the potential, the centrifugal term. The free electron wave can be represented as a superposition of partial angular momentum waves for which we will use the symbol ᐉЈ ͑=ᐉ Ϯ 1͒ to allow distinction from the parent orbital angular momentum quantum number ᐉ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid change in the A channel β parameter at photon energies near the channel B threshold (Figure 3) is not consistent with Cooper−Zare direct detachment behavior. Instead the behavior is caused by a dipole-bound-like state (by analogy with previous work on monosolvated cluster anions) 9. 16,17 Dipole bound anion states are supported by dipole moments in excess of 2.5 D 18,19 and have been subject to extensive studies by (among others) Jordan and co-workers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%