Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1991.131859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct adaptive control for industrial manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is indicative of the non-asymptotic training progression of the AMBC algorithm. Similar results have been previously reported for the PUMA [3].…”
Section: Adaptation/learning Of Model Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is indicative of the non-asymptotic training progression of the AMBC algorithm. Similar results have been previously reported for the PUMA [3].…”
Section: Adaptation/learning Of Model Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Adding payload significantly improved the overall tracking accuracy of the AMBC algorithm. The peak errors in Fig In the PUMA evaluations the after learning performance with and without payload was roughly equivalent [3]. This contrast highlights the difficulty of quickly and effectively learning the parameters of a lightweight manipulator.…”
Section: Payload Adapt At Ion/ Learningmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In relation to this one should realize that due to the availability of fast processing equipment the computational complexity of the model-based algorithms no longer impedes their implementation. This can be concluded from the increasing number of applications, see for instance [9], [lo], [ 121, [20]. Similar experiments need to be done in order to see if the proposed adaptive controller also performs successfully in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%