1985
DOI: 10.1016/0167-6393(85)90042-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diphthongs: A case study of dynamic auditory processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should not be a surprise since the diphthong formants cannot be described by only one value of frequency (Bladon, 1985 ). In both noise and reverberation, the diphthongs were often perceived as their initial monophthongs in agreement with the N•b•lek and Dagenais (1986) data for the male talker.…”
Section: Diphthong/monophthong Errors In Noise and Reverberationsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This should not be a surprise since the diphthong formants cannot be described by only one value of frequency (Bladon, 1985 ). In both noise and reverberation, the diphthongs were often perceived as their initial monophthongs in agreement with the N•b•lek and Dagenais (1986) data for the male talker.…”
Section: Diphthong/monophthong Errors In Noise and Reverberationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In reverberation, there was relatively more diphthong/monophthong (44.3%) than monophthong/monophthong (16.7%) errors. It appears that reverberation was more effective than noise in masking the rate 0f change which is an important perceptual cue for diphthong identification (Bladon, 1985).…”
Section: Errors For Monophthongs and Diphthongs In Both Noise And mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Monophthong responses to diphthong stimuli were also reported by Pickett (1957) who tested vowel identification in the presence of background noise. Correct identification of diphthongs requires perception of temporal changes in the frequencies of formants (Gay, 1968;Bladon, 1985;Peeters, 1991 ). Thus it appears that when diphthong tokens are identified as monophthongs, the temporal changes in the formants are not perceived and when/o•/ and/ou/are confused, the temporal changes are misinterpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stimuli were called types 1 and 2, respectively. In natural productions, either type of transition may result in correct diphthong identification in undegraded listening conditions (Gay, 1968;Bladon, 1985) or correct statistically based classification (Gottfried et al, 1993). For each type of diphthong, a continuum was constructed in which the first end-point stimulus was a steadystate/o/, then the duration of the final segment containing F1 and F2 transitions was increased stepwise to a value which produced a clear/ox/.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 summarized mean range and rate of F2 change for the diphthongs in Cangnan. 12 Previous studies show that F2 range and rate of change could characterize diphthongs when a language has a simple inventory of diphthongs ( [30], [31]), but would have problems when a language has a complex inventory of diphthongs ( [32], [33], [34]). [35] further points out that F2 range and rate of change could characterize diphthongs when falling diphthongs and rising diphthongs are separated; but it would have problems when falling and rising diphthongs are taken into account together.…”
Section: Dynamic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%