This communication was suggested by reading an article on an outbreak of tonsillitis suspected to be diphtheritic by Dr. S. A. Blauner.1 Through the courtesy of Dr. Blauner, I was enabled to study the outbreak described. I saw the last three cases in the acute shape, and made cultures from the sick and convalescent children and from many of the healthy children distributed in the different parts of the institution. The laboratory and clinical material considered together lead me to somewhat different conclusions from those drawn by Dr. Blauner. Although the results of all the laboratory examinations were sent to him, he either failed to remember them or did not interpret them as I do.Before considering this special outbreak, it seems desirable to state the evidence which supports the view that sufficient antitoxin in the body to prevent the development of a positive Schick test under ordinary conditions will prevent the development of diphtheria. There can be no doubt that the injection of 500 units of antitoxin will give children an immunity for a period of at least twelve days and usually twenty days. The proof of this is derived from its use in many out¬ breaks and in the exposed children of hundreds of thousands of families. The recent statement by Haven's that about 20 per cent, of diphtheria bacilli are of a different type from the one used to produce toxin for the immunization of horses, and that the available monovalent antitoxin will not completely neutralize the toxin made by this other type, and that, therefore, diphtheria may develop from infection with this other type in children showing a negative Schick test to the standard toxin, has not been borne out by experience nor confirmed by us in experimental work. The evidence that antitoxin is the only substance in the body that can prevent the toxin acting is also so con¬ clusive that we can assume that a negative Schick test means the