2018
DOI: 10.1134/s1560090418010098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diphilic Macromolecular Brushes with a Polyimide Backbone and Poly(methacrylic acid) Blocks in Side Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degree of polymerization of the PI backbone was n = 52 ( M n = 21.0 × 10 3 , M w / M n = 2.2). Grafting PMMA chains onto PI was carried out according to the activator generated by electron transfer atom transfer radical polymerization (AGET ATRP) technique . To determine molecular weight and other molecular characteristics of grafted chains, they were separated from PI‐PMMA by selective alkaline hydrolysis .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degree of polymerization of the PI backbone was n = 52 ( M n = 21.0 × 10 3 , M w / M n = 2.2). Grafting PMMA chains onto PI was carried out according to the activator generated by electron transfer atom transfer radical polymerization (AGET ATRP) technique . To determine molecular weight and other molecular characteristics of grafted chains, they were separated from PI‐PMMA by selective alkaline hydrolysis .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern synthetic approaches make it possible to prepare grafted copolymers with a controlled molecular architecture and molar mass. Amphiphilic molecular brushes structure of backbone and side chains which differ strongly have been studied for a long time [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Such brushes attract a significant amount of attention due to the wide possibilities of regulating their characteristics by variation of the chemical structure of components and the architecture parameters, namely, length of main and said chains, and grafting density of the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such brushes attract a significant amount of attention due to the wide possibilities of regulating their characteristics by variation of the chemical structure of components and the architecture parameters, namely, length of main and said chains, and grafting density of the latter. In particular, polymer brushes with a polyimide backbone and side chains of polymethylmethacrylate [10][11][12] or polymethacrylic acid (PMAA) [4,13] have been synthesized and studied in solutions and films. It has been shown that the brushes with PMAA chains may be used as nanocontainers for organic luminophores which are used in photodynamic cancer therapy [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the architecture parameters of grafted copolymers strongly affect the solubility and the assembly behavior of macromolecules compared to linear diphilic block-copolymers [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. For example, the shape of the molecules of dense amphiphilic brushes in a thermodynamically poor solvent for the backbone resembles a star-shaped molecule, the core of which is a collapsed main chain, and the grafted chains are arms [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] A decrease in the grafting density of the side chains leads to a decline in solubility and to aggregate formation due to the interaction of insoluble components [ 15 , 16 ]. In particular, diphilic molecular brushes are able to form ordered micellar structures by the self-assembly processes of macromolecules in selective solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%