1995
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dioxin Induces Localized, Graded Changes in Chromatin Structure: Implications forCyp1A1Gene Transcription

Abstract: In mouse hepatoma cells, the environmental contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD, or dioxin) induces Cyp1A1 gene transcription, a process that requires two basic helix-loop-helix regulatory proteins, the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (Arnt). We have used a ligation-mediated PCR technique to analyze dioxin-induced changes in protein-DNA interactions and chromatin structure of the Cyp1A1 enhancer-promoter in its native chromosomal s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene Domain Sequence at position number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 more access during transactivation initiated by the DRE-bound activated Ah receptor, a process shown to involve changes in chromatin structure [44]. We note that seven DRE core motifs within the human CYP1A1 gene enhancer including non-functional ones possess counterparts at similar positions in the mouse gene, although the sequence surrounding the core motif partly shows marked differences (Fig.…”
Section: Organismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene Domain Sequence at position number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 more access during transactivation initiated by the DRE-bound activated Ah receptor, a process shown to involve changes in chromatin structure [44]. We note that seven DRE core motifs within the human CYP1A1 gene enhancer including non-functional ones possess counterparts at similar positions in the mouse gene, although the sequence surrounding the core motif partly shows marked differences (Fig.…”
Section: Organismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo footprinting using dimethyl sulfate (DMS; Sigma) was done as described previously (13,14). To analyze DRE 3, we used the following primer set: primer 1, 5 ¶-TTCAATCAAGAGGCGCGAACCT-3 ¶; primer 2, 5 ¶-AACCTCAGCTAGTCGCCCGGGCTCT-3 ¶; and primer 3, 5 ¶-GTCCAGCCCCGCGGCGCCTCTGGCCTT-3 ¶.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo footprinting of AhRC-binding sites. Cells treated with 5-aza-CdR (1 Amol/L) for 7 days and/or TCDD (10 nmol/L) for 2 hours were analyzed by in vivo footprinting as described previously (13,14). N, naked genomic DNA treated with DMS in vitro was also analyzed.…”
Section: Cancer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AhRE binding induces chromatin remodelling at the promoter which favours transcription (Elferink & Whitlock 1990, Fujii-Kuriyama et al 1995, Okino & Whitlock 1995. Chromatin structure is also important in maintaining transcriptional silence in the uninduced state (Okino & Whitlock 1995). AHR and ARNT are expressed predominantly in the liver (Dolwick et al 1993, Li et al 1994, and both are essential for cyp1a1 induction (Ryu et al 1996, Foussat et al 1998, Zaher et al 1998, Tomita et al 2000.…”
Section: Cytochrome P-450 Induction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). AhRE binding induces chromatin remodelling at the promoter which favours transcription (Elferink & Whitlock 1990, Fujii-Kuriyama et al 1995, Okino & Whitlock 1995. Chromatin structure is also important in maintaining transcriptional silence in the uninduced state (Okino & Whitlock 1995).…”
Section: Cytochrome P-450 Induction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%