2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt00184e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diosmium compounds containing bis(imidazole)-p-quinone bridging ligands

Abstract: The doubly deprotonated bridging ligand L12- derived from 2,6-bis(2-pyridyl)-1,5-dihydro-1’,4’-benzoquinono[2’,3’-d:5’,6’-d’]diimidazole H2L1 forms coordination compounds with two bis(2,2’-bipyridine)osmium(II) complex fragments in anti ([1](ClO4)2) and syn configuration ([2](ClO4)2) of {(μ-L1)[Os(bpy)2]2}(ClO4)2, as evident from...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, no such variation in the binding mode of L2 2– was evident as a function of osmium metal precursors Os­(bpy) 2 ( 8 ) and Os­(pap) 2 ( 9 ), and the bidentate N – ,O – donating mode of L2 2– was systematically stabilized as in 5 (Figure ). The average Os II -N­(L2 2– ): 2.075­(4) Å, Os II -O­(L2 2– ): 2.084(5) Å and Os II -N­(bpy/pap): 2.042(4)/2.016(8) Å distances were in good agreement with those of the reported analogous systems . The dπ–pπ interaction (back-bonding) between Ru II /Os II and the low-lying π*­(azo) orbitals of pap in [ 7 ]­(ClO 4 ) 2 and 9 , respectively, was also reflected in the relevant MN­(azo, pap)/NN (pap) distances as in the case of 2 or 4 (Table S2, Supporting Information) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, no such variation in the binding mode of L2 2– was evident as a function of osmium metal precursors Os­(bpy) 2 ( 8 ) and Os­(pap) 2 ( 9 ), and the bidentate N – ,O – donating mode of L2 2– was systematically stabilized as in 5 (Figure ). The average Os II -N­(L2 2– ): 2.075­(4) Å, Os II -O­(L2 2– ): 2.084(5) Å and Os II -N­(bpy/pap): 2.042(4)/2.016(8) Å distances were in good agreement with those of the reported analogous systems . The dπ–pπ interaction (back-bonding) between Ru II /Os II and the low-lying π*­(azo) orbitals of pap in [ 7 ]­(ClO 4 ) 2 and 9 , respectively, was also reflected in the relevant MN­(azo, pap)/NN (pap) distances as in the case of 2 or 4 (Table S2, Supporting Information) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The multiple stepwise reductions of M II -L 2– (MRu/Os, L = L1 2– or L2 2– or L2′ 2– ) complexes were essentially associated with the pap (azo) or bpy (diamine)-based orbitals (Scheme S1, Supporting Information). The radical-based EPR of the first reduced state (R1, Figure ) of 4 – , 7 + , and 9 – ( S = 1/2, Figure ) also corroborated the same. , The two-electron reduced triplet state of 2 2– (R2, Figure , S = 1) expectedly displayed a radical EPR at g = 1.996 but without any forbidden half-field signal at g ≈ 4, possibly due to the fast relaxation process at 110 K …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 1:1 conducting and diamagnetic ( S = 0) [ 1 ]ClO 4 –[ 3 ]ClO 4 exhibited satisfactory elemental analysis and mass spectrometric data (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information and Experimental Section). The NN (azo) vibration of L (≈1480 cm –1 ) shifted to ≈1430 cm –1 on metal coordination in [ 1 ]ClO 4 –[ 3 ]ClO 4 , , and ClO 4 – vibration in each of the metal complexes appeared near 1100 cm –1 in their IR spectra (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information and Experimental Section). The 1 H NMR spectra of the complexes displayed aromatic proton resonances in the standard chemical shift region of δ = 7–11 ppm, and the methyl protons of L2-derived [ 2 ]ClO 4 appeared at δ = 2.4–2.6 ppm (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information and Experimental Section).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diastereomeric 2a and 2b displayed almost identical electrochemical responses, that is, reversible successive two oxidative (O1: 0.05/0.04 V, O2: 0.75/0.74 V) waves and one reductive (R1: −1.36/–1.37 V) wave in CH 3 CN within the experimental potential window of ±2 V versus SCE. The stability of the electronic form of (acac) 2 Ru III (μ-L4 •– )­Ru II (acac) 2 ( S = 0) for the isolated 2a or 2b could be rationalized by the large K c2 (between O1 and R1, Figure ) value of ∼10 23 (Table ), which was also suggestive of a valence-averaged class III mixed-valent state, that is, {Ru 2.5 (μ-L4 •– )­Ru 2.5 } instead of a valence-localized class II situation of {Ru III (μ-L4 •– )­Ru II } . The considerably high K c1 of 10 11 (O2–O1 in Figure , Table ) implied the inherent stability of the intermediate oxidized species 2a + or 2b + ([(acac) 2 Ru III (μ-L4 •– )­Ru III (acac) 2 ] + ), which indeed facilitated its development as well as isolation from the initial reaction mixture along with 2a / 2b (Scheme ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%