2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:ebfi.0000035432.12313.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dine or Dash?: Ontogenetic Shift in the Response of Yellow Perch to Conspecific Alarm Cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before each replicate, an average sized 0+ perch was introduced to the predator for the production of predator-induced chemical alarm signal (Mathis et al 1995;Mirza et al 2003;Harvey and Brown 2004). After the change of the experimental set-up concerning the predator, everything was cleaned and the whole water was replaced to diminish long lasting effects of chemical cues.…”
Section: Habitat Use Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before each replicate, an average sized 0+ perch was introduced to the predator for the production of predator-induced chemical alarm signal (Mathis et al 1995;Mirza et al 2003;Harvey and Brown 2004). After the change of the experimental set-up concerning the predator, everything was cleaned and the whole water was replaced to diminish long lasting effects of chemical cues.…”
Section: Habitat Use Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All juveniles had the same size range, but those from the experiments with Megaleporinus were descendants from a different pair than those from the other experiments. Variations in the response of water controls was also observed in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) Harvey, Brown (2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, when adult silver catfish were exposed to conspecifics alarm cues they remained immobile in the first minutes and then increased swimming activity (Souza-Bastos et al, 2014), as observed in the present study. Furthermore, Rivulus hartii (currently Anablepsoides hartii) and yellow perch also demonstrated significant size-dependent trends in response to heterospecific and conspecific alarm cues, respectively, with smaller individuals exhibiting antipredator responses and larger individuals shifting their behavior to increased levels of activity consistent with a foraging or predatory response (Harvey, Brown, 2004;Elvidge et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased local recruitment of predators in the presence of damage-released prey cues under natural conditions (Elvidge & Brown, 2012;Wisenden & Thiel, 2002) and increased predator foraging behaviour under laboratory conditions provide additional evidence for the occurrence of exploitative use of chemicals in this context. Conversely, size and life-history mediated differences in response to damage-released cues Harvey & Brown, 2004; this study) may not be indicative of foraging responses to damage-released cues, but rather decreased relevance of a particular cue to larger receivers (Brown, Ferrari, et al, 2010) that have grown out of the size range susceptible to shared common predators (Popova, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%