2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diminishing evapotranspiration paradox and its cause in the Middle East and North Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, potential evapotranspiration (PET) will show a high positive anomaly (with respect the reference period) as a result of temperature increase in the region as reported by [3,4] . For this reason, Terink W, et al [1] made a special focus on the combination of supply (represented by the total precipitation) and demand (represented by the PET) to possibly detect critical periods with regard to water availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly, potential evapotranspiration (PET) will show a high positive anomaly (with respect the reference period) as a result of temperature increase in the region as reported by [3,4] . For this reason, Terink W, et al [1] made a special focus on the combination of supply (represented by the total precipitation) and demand (represented by the PET) to possibly detect critical periods with regard to water availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Regardless of the physical principles of which the PM is based, the PM has some limitations. For instance, Brutsaert W and Parlange MB [9] reported that under extreme dry condition (as in the MENA region; [3,4]), the PM method may not be suitable for computing the PET because the PM requires a surplus of soil moisture (not available in the MENA region because the soil moisture has values up to 11 mm (Figure S1). Besides, the PM involves many atmospheric variables (not often available spatially or temporary) and majority of these variables are computed empirically leading to a large increase of the uncertainty of the computed PET as reported by [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KGE metric, which combines the normalized variance, the spatial variability ratio, and Pearson's correlation (represented as "r"), was used to quantify the skills of GCMs. The KGE metric is chosen due to its potential to capture extremes and ranges from 1 to ∞ (Hamed et al, 2023;Sobh et al, 2022;. A value of 1 KGE score shows the best match.…”
Section: Gcm Evaluation Based On Past Performancementioning
confidence: 99%