2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3156.2000.00040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diminished men and dangerous women: representations of gender and learning disability in early‐ and mid‐nineteenth‐century Britain

Abstract: SummaryThe present article explores the relationship of gender and learning disabilities in early‐ and mid‐nineteenth‐century literary representations of people with learning disabilities. Literary texts are useful historical documents because these often foreground how learning disabilities worked symbolically in a social context and enable us to examine the ideological forces shaping notions of learning disabilities. The images explored in the present study suggest some common cultural themes. Men with learn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 19th-century English literature, men with learning disabilities were portrayed as lacking an essential component of masculine identity, usually because of their inability to handle money (McDonagh, 2000). Women with learning disabilities embodied a paradox, being seen as threatening because of their 'undisciplined sexuality', yet also sexually innocent and in need of protection.…”
Section: Gender and Social Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 19th-century English literature, men with learning disabilities were portrayed as lacking an essential component of masculine identity, usually because of their inability to handle money (McDonagh, 2000). Women with learning disabilities embodied a paradox, being seen as threatening because of their 'undisciplined sexuality', yet also sexually innocent and in need of protection.…”
Section: Gender and Social Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OED points to its first appearance in this sense in Farmer’s (1891) slang dictionary, but it does not seem to have been widespread before then. ‘Dick’ in Dickens is thus neither insulting nor psychosexual in any way (contrary to claims made by McDonagh, 2001 ), at least contemporaneously.…”
Section: Modelling a Simple Mindmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Third , McDonagh () states that: ‘Social concerns can be produced in literary works, making literary documents important sources of information concerning the ideological function of people’ (p.49). In his very useful paper, McDonagh highlights the considerable importance of understanding the social context of so‐called pathological behaviour and, in particular, how it can affect adversely gender differences and perceptions.…”
Section: Setting the Scenementioning
confidence: 99%