2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0169(200102)48:2<149::aid-cm1005>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diminished levels of the putative tumor suppressor proteins EXT1 and EXT2 in exostosis chondrocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Mutations resulting in reduced EXT1 and EXT2 protein levels have been previously reported, which might be attributed to potential reduction in mRNA levels due to nonsense, frameshift, or splice-site mutations. 24 In some cases, reduced EXT1 protein was accompanied by reduced EXT2 in exostosis chondrocytes. 24 The reason for this is not understood but may be related to multiple genetic hits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3 Mutations resulting in reduced EXT1 and EXT2 protein levels have been previously reported, which might be attributed to potential reduction in mRNA levels due to nonsense, frameshift, or splice-site mutations. 24 In some cases, reduced EXT1 protein was accompanied by reduced EXT2 in exostosis chondrocytes. 24 The reason for this is not understood but may be related to multiple genetic hits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The analysis of 11 SO tissue samples identified in five of them the deletion of one copy of EXT1 gene or part of it; this observation is in agreement with previous studies reporting that small or big deletions of EXT1 are the most common alteration in SO (Bove´e et al, 1999a, b;Bernard et al, 2001;Hameetman et al, 2007), while single-base pair mutations are indeed rare (1 out of 11 SO samples in the present analysis). No mutations were found for 5 of 11 SOs (45%), with a percentage of negative SO similar to those reported from other authors (Hall et al, 2002;Trebicz-Geffen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the growth plate, IHH requires interaction with HSPGs to diffuse through the extracellular matrix to its receptor (21). Somatic mutations in the EXT genes are extremely rare in non-hereditary osteochondromas and have been described in only 3 cases (24)(25)(26). However, the observation that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and clonal rearrangement at 8q24 (EXT1 locus) are as frequent in non-hereditary osteochondromas as are EXT1 gene mutations in patients with hereditary osteochondromas, suggests that EXT1 may be involved in the development of non-hereditary osteochondromas (10,11,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%