2015
DOI: 10.1094/asbcj-2015-0103-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimethyl Sulfide Stripping Behavior during Wort Boiling Using Response Surface Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other parameters of predictive models in biological systems that measure the relative deviation from the observed (experimental) and predicted (calculated) parameters were determined and results presented in Table 1. As observed, the closeness of the B f and A f to unity Equation (1)) and that of AAD to zero indicates reasonable agreements between the predicted and observed parameters (Desobgo, Stafford, & Metcalfe, 2015;Sobowale et al, in press).…”
Section: Statistical Models and Validationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Other parameters of predictive models in biological systems that measure the relative deviation from the observed (experimental) and predicted (calculated) parameters were determined and results presented in Table 1. As observed, the closeness of the B f and A f to unity Equation (1)) and that of AAD to zero indicates reasonable agreements between the predicted and observed parameters (Desobgo, Stafford, & Metcalfe, 2015;Sobowale et al, in press).…”
Section: Statistical Models and Validationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The evaluation of the real performance of the predictive models obtained for both walnut and almond oil extraction was done according to Desobgo et al, (2015). According to these authors, a perfect agreement between observed and predicted responses is related to Bf and Af values of 1 and AAD of 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USA). For model validation, the response variable (OY, Y 1 ) was measured, in triplicate, under optimal extraction conditions, and the absolute average deviation (AAD), the Bias factor (Bf), and the Accuracy factor (Af) were calculated according to Desobgo et al, (2015). Finally, the percentage error between the predicted and the experimental values were calculated according to Barrera et al, (2016).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Response Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high values of R 2 (.9565 for yield and .9787 for energy consumption) and Adj‐ R 2 (0.9130 for yield and 0.9574 for energy consumption) are approximately 1, showing a high degree of correlation between the predicted and experimental values. The quality of the model fitting was also validated by the absolute average deviation (AAD), the bias factor ( B f ), and the accuracy factor ( A f ) according to Desobgo, Stafford, and Metcalfe (). The values of B f (1.0017 for yield and 0.989 for energy consumption) and A f (1.07 for yield and 1.3103 for energy consumption) are close to 1 and the values of AAD (0.8558 for yield and 0.048 for energy consumption) are close to 0 as shown in Table indicates perfect agreements between observed and predicted responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…values. The quality of the model fitting was also validated by the absolute average deviation (AAD), the bias factor (B f ), and the accuracy factor (A f ) according to Desobgo, Stafford, and Metcalfe (2015).…”
Section: Model Fitting and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%