1998
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimerization of the Head–Rod Junction of Scallop Myosin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different muscle types have fine-tuned S2 stability to different extents, as evidenced by the observation that N-terminal fragments of native scallop myosin S2 shorter than 340 residues fail to dimerize (13), whereas the 126-residue fragment of human cardiac ␤-myosin II described here, S2-⌬, can be isolated as a stable dimer after expression in Escherichia coli (5). A comparison of S2 sequences from different species and tissues reveals strong sequence variation in the first three heptads; however, overall features such as charge distribution or the positioning of noncanonical residues in a and d positions are relatively conserved (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different muscle types have fine-tuned S2 stability to different extents, as evidenced by the observation that N-terminal fragments of native scallop myosin S2 shorter than 340 residues fail to dimerize (13), whereas the 126-residue fragment of human cardiac ␤-myosin II described here, S2-⌬, can be isolated as a stable dimer after expression in Escherichia coli (5). A comparison of S2 sequences from different species and tissues reveals strong sequence variation in the first three heptads; however, overall features such as charge distribution or the positioning of noncanonical residues in a and d positions are relatively conserved (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first hypothesis (Vibert andCraig, 1982, 1985;Vibert et al, 1986) is supported by data and modeling showing that 1) the head-rod junction (the neck) of the myosin molecule is flexible (Málnási-Csizmadia et al, 1998;Li et al, 2003), 2) Ca ++ binding likely changes neck flexibility (Houdusse and Cohen, 1996;Málnási-Csizmadia et al, 1999) (although see Wells and Bagshaw, 1984b), 3) the two myosin heads can lie alongside one another (Offer and Knight, 1996), 4) the ATP and Ca ++ binding sites of the two heads communicate in the 'off' state (Kalabokis and Szent-Györgyi, 1997;Azzu et al, 2006), EDTA increases the extent to which the two heads show correlated movement (Wells and Bagshaw, 1983), and 6) in the absence of Ca ++ the heads are highly ordered and primarily extend towards the tail (Vibert and Craig, 1985;Craig, 1989, 1992;Stafford III et al, 2001;Zhao and Craig, 2003a). The idea is that in the absence of Ca ++ the heads interact with one another and are thus prevented from interacting with the thin filament, and Ca ++ -induced changes in the flexibility of the myosin neck (where the regulatory complex is located) frees the heads to act independently.…”
Section: 411mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, it is worth noting that earlier work using a 93 amino acid peptide from the coiled-coil forming region of scallop muscle myosin-2 also gave rise to an APCC structure (53), but this was known to form a parallel coiled-coil in the context of the full-length molecule (54). At present, the resolution of our negatively stained EMs, obtained using recombinant M10HMM with the leucine zipper sequence after amino acid 936, does not allow us to discern the tail structure directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%