2007
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00321-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimer percolation and jamming on simple cubic lattice

Abstract: We consider site percolation of dimers ("neadles") on simple cubic lattice. The percolation threshold is estimated as p perc c ≈ 0.2555 ± 0.0001. The jamming threshold is estimated as p jamm c = 0.799 ± 0.002. PACS. 64.60.Ak Renormalization-group, fractal, and percolation studies of phase transitions -05.10.-a Computational methods in statistical physics and nonlinear dynamics -81.20.Fw Sol-gel processing, precipitation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, A 2 = 2.63(5) and A 3 = −5.2(2). • In the case of dimers (k = 2), the value of θ j = 0.918388 (16) obtained in the present paper corrects the value θ j = 0.799(2) calculated by Tarasevich and Cherkasova [29]. This important finding was corroborated by using an independent algorithm developed to measure the coverage as a function of time θ (t).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, A 2 = 2.63(5) and A 3 = −5.2(2). • In the case of dimers (k = 2), the value of θ j = 0.918388 (16) obtained in the present paper corrects the value θ j = 0.799(2) calculated by Tarasevich and Cherkasova [29]. This important finding was corroborated by using an independent algorithm developed to measure the coverage as a function of time θ (t).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2 corrects the previously reported value of θ j = 0.799(2) [29]. Due to the methodology used in this contribution, our estimate of θ j is expected to be more accurate than that reported previously.…”
Section: Simulation Results: Random Sequential Adsorption Of Straightsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations