2018
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.15026.ber
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of variation across Internet registers

Abstract: This paper presents a study that sought to identify the dimensions of variation underlying a corpus of Internet texts, using Biber’s (1988) multi-dimensional (MD) analysis framework. The corpus was compiled following the method proposed by Biber (1993), according to which the size of each register subcorpus should be determined based on the linguistic variation across the texts. The corpus was tagged using the Biber Tagger and the features were counted and submitted to a factor analysis, which suggested three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results contribute to the growing body of evidence that online registers are a different form of communication, and not a hybrid mode somewhere between speech and writing. Studies of Twitter ( Clarke and Grieve, 2019 ), Reddit ( Liimatta, 2019 ), and other online platforms ( Hardy and Friginal, 2012 ; Titak and Roberson, 2013 ; Pavalanathan et al, 2017 ; Berber Sardinha, 2018 ), point to a new type of communication, including individual variation within the various platforms and communication channels. For instance, Liimatta (2019) found the now-familiar informational style in Reddit posts, but also, similar to the present analysis, an instructional focus.…”
Section: Online News Comments Compared To Other Online Registersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results contribute to the growing body of evidence that online registers are a different form of communication, and not a hybrid mode somewhere between speech and writing. Studies of Twitter ( Clarke and Grieve, 2019 ), Reddit ( Liimatta, 2019 ), and other online platforms ( Hardy and Friginal, 2012 ; Titak and Roberson, 2013 ; Pavalanathan et al, 2017 ; Berber Sardinha, 2018 ), point to a new type of communication, including individual variation within the various platforms and communication channels. For instance, Liimatta (2019) found the now-familiar informational style in Reddit posts, but also, similar to the present analysis, an instructional focus.…”
Section: Online News Comments Compared To Other Online Registersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ever-growing body of research analyses online language in general (e.g., Crystal, 2011 ; McCulloch, 2020 ), specific online registers, such as email ( Frehner, 2008 ; McVeigh, 2020 ), blogs ( Herring et al, 2004 ; Peterson, 2011 ), reviews ( Taboada, 2011 ; Vásquez, 2014 ), Facebook ( West, 2013 ; Farina, 2018 ), Twitter ( Zappavigna, 2012 ; Clarke and Grieve, 2019 ), or online and social media language in general ( Giltrow and Stein, 2009 ; Titak and Roberson, 2013 ; Page et al, 2014 ; Biber and Egbert, 2016 ; Berber Sardinha, 2018 ; Biber and Egbert, 2018 ). Little attention, however, has been paid to the linguistic characteristics of online news comments, a register now ubiquitous in our interactions with news, whether on the pages of newspapers or through platforms such as Twitter and Facebook.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions of such genres are being actively investigated by quantitative methods. For example, Sardinha (2018) highlights the expression of stance and its two varieties that are important for online communication genres-interactional evidentiality and interactional affect. Thus, when expressing a position, the dominant role of the pragmatics of online communication and main role of the communicative intention leading to speech impact is again justified.…”
Section: Relevant Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the variety of language use and users as well as the extreme sizes of data available online have attracted the attention of natural language processing (NLP), where online data have been used to improve the performance of automatic syntactic analysis (Zeman et al 2017) and machine translation (Tiedemann et al 2016;Srivastava et al 2017), for example. Similarly, in corpus linguistics, online data have been applied, among others, to analyze the new text varieties that have emerged in online settings (Titak and Roberson, 2013;Berber Sardinha 2018) and to examine rare expressions and constructions that are difficult if not impossible to study in traditional language resources (Schäfer 2016;Huumo et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%